Dynamic Relationship Between ESG Disclosure and Corporate Performance: Evidence from Asian Capital Markets
ESG disclosure has evolved as a vital element of corporate sustainability reporting nevertheless, empirical literature regarding its economic impacts still remains insufficient, particularly in Asian economies. This examination fills this gap by investigating the effect of enhanced ESG disclosure on accounting and market-based performance of publicly listed firms. The study employs panel dataset of 1,406 listed firms with 30,932 firm-year observations from 11 Asian economies, for a period of 22 years from 2002 to 2023. The association between ESG disclosure and corporate performance is studied using two-way fixed-effects panel regression. To guarantee the robustness of the findings, the analysis is supported with robustness tests, panel co-integration analysis, Granger causality tests, and Structural Equation Modelling. The empirical results show that ESG disclosure has a significant positive effect on accounting and market-based performance indicators of firms. It results in improved profitability, market valuation, investor confidence and reduced firms' cost of capital, which implies that transparent sustainability reporting decreases information asymmetry and perceived investment risk. The findings encourage firms to align ESG disclosure into their strategic and governance mechanisms in order to achieve improved performance with reduced costs and strong corporate image. Unlike prior studies that investigate individual countries and employ a single financial indicator of firm performance, this study extends the academic ESG literature by offering cross-country empirical evidence from Asian capital markets with a multidimensional analysis of corporate performance. References Aboud, A., & Diab, A. (2019). The financial and market consequences of environmental, social and governance ratings: The implications of recent political volatility in Egypt. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 10(3), 498–520. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-06-2018-0167 Al-Kake, F., Harun, A., Othman, B., & MH, N. (2019). The effect of corporate governance on firm profitability: Evidence from London Stock Exchange. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 23(2), 727–742. Al-Matari, E. M., Al-Swidi, A. K., Fadzil, F. H., & Al-Matari, Y. A. (2012). The impact of board characteristics on firm performance: Evidence from nonfinancial listed companies in Kuwaiti Stock Exchange. International Journal of Accounting and Financial Reporting, 2(2), 310–332. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijafr.v2i2.2384 Alam, Z., & Tariq, Y. B. (2023). Corporate sustainability performance evaluation and firm financial performance: Evidence from Pakistan. SAGE Open, 13(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231184856 Alsayegh, M. F., Abdul Rahman, R., & Homayoun, S. (2020). Corporate economic, environmental, and social sustainability performance transformation through ESG disclosure. Sustainability, 12(9), Article 3910. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093910 Altin, M., Al Ani, M. K., Hussainey, K., & Streimikiene, D. (2026). The impact of sustainability expenditures on ESG performance: The moderating role of financial reporting quality. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. Advance online publication. Ameer, R., & Othman, R. (2012). Sustainability practices and corporate financial performance: A study based on the top global corporations. Journal of Business Ethics, 108(1), 61–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-1063-y Amran, A., & Haniffa, R. (2011). Evidence in development of sustainability reporting: A case of a developing country. Business Strategy and the Environment, 20(3), 141–156. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.672 Atan, R., Alam, M. M., Said, J., & Zamri, M. (2018). The impacts of environmental, social, and governance factors on firm performance: Panel study of Malaysian companies. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 29(2), 182–194. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-03-2017-0033 Balmer, J. M. T. (2001). Corporate identity, corporate branding and corporate marketing: Seeing through the fog. European Journal of Marketing, 35(3/4), 248–291. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090560110694763 Bamahros, H. M., Alquhaif, A., Qasem, A., Wan-Hussin, W. N., Thomran, M., Al-Duais, S. D., Shukeri, S. N., & Khojally, H. M. (2022). Corporate governance mechanisms and ESG reporting: Evidence from the Saudi stock market. Sustainability, 14(10), Article 6202. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14106202 Barnett, M. L., & Salomon, R. M. (2012). Does it pay to be really good? Addressing the shape of the relationship between social and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 33(11), 1304–1320. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.1980 Barney, J., Wright, M., & Ketchen, D. J., Jr. (2001). The resource-based view of the firm: Ten years after 1991. Journal of Management, 27(6), 625–641. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630102700601 Becchetti, L., Ciciretti, R., & Hasan, I. (2015). Corporate social responsibility, stakeholder risk, and idiosyncratic volatility. Journal of Corporate Finance, 35, 297–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2015.09.007 Boesso, G., Favotto, F., & Michelon, G. (2015). Stakeholder prioritization, strategic corporate social responsibility and company performance: Further evidence. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 22(6), 424–440. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1359 Breuer, N., & Nau, C. (2014). ESG performance and corporate financial performance. Department of Business Administration. Buallay, A. (2019). Between cost and value: Investigating the effects of sustainability reporting on a firm's performance. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 20(4), 481–496. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAAR-12-2017-0137 Burgman, R. J., & Van Clieaf, M. (2012). Total shareholder return (TSR) and management performance: A performance metric appropriately used, or mostly abused? Rotman International Journal of Pension Management, 5(2), 32–37. https://doi.org/10.3138/rijpm.5.2.32 Clark, G. L., Feiner, A., & Viehs, M. (2015). From the stockholder to the stakeholder: How sustainability can drive financial outperformance (SSRN Working Paper No. 2508281). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2508281 Clarkson, M. B. E. (1995). A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 92–117. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9503271994 De Villiers, C., Naiker, V., & Van Staden, C. J. (2011). The effect of board characteristics on firm environmental performance. Journal of Management, 37(6), 1636–1663. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311411506 Delmas, M. A., & Blass, V. D. (2010). Measuring corporate environmental performance: The trade-offs of sustainability ratings. Business Strategy and the Environment, 19(4), 245–260. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.676 Dias, A. (2013). Market capitalization and value-at-risk. Journal of Banking & Finance, 37(12), 5248–5260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2013.04.015 Eccles, R. G., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). The impact of corporate sustainability on organizational processes and performance. Management Science, 60(11), 2835–2857. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.1984 El-Bassiouny, D., & Letmathe, P. (2018). The adoption of CSR practices in Egypt: Internal efficiency or external legitimation? Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 9(5), 642–665. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-10-2017-0119 Fatemi, A., Glaum, M., & Kaiser, S. (2018). ESG performance and firm value: The moderating role of disclosure. Global Finance Journal, 38, 45–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfj.2017.03.001 Flammer, C. (2021). Corporate green bonds. Journal of Financial Economics, 142(2), 499–516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2021.01.010 Freeman, R. E., & Phillips, R. A. (2002). Stakeholder theory: A libertarian defense. Business Ethics Quarterly, 12(3), 331–349. https://doi.org/10.2307/3858020 Friede, G., Busch, T., & Bassen, A. (2015). ESG and financial performance: Aggregated evidence from more than 2,000 empirical studies. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 5(4), 210–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2015.1118917 Ftiti, Z., Jeriji, M., Louhichi, W., Mensi, Y., & Zenaidi, A. (2024). ESG dimensions, firm performance and corporate governance systems. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics, 18(4–5), 492–521. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBGE.2024.139315 Gangi, F., Daniele, L. M., & Varrone, N. (2020). How do corporate environmental policy and corporate reputation affect risk-adjusted financial performance? Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(5), 1975–1991. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2479 Giannarakis, G., Konteos, G., & Sariannidis, N. (2014). Financial, governance and environmental determinants of corporate social responsible disclosure. Management Decision, 52(10), 1928–1951. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-05-2014-0296 Goss, A., & Roberts, G. S. (2011). The impact of corporate social responsibility on the cost of bank loans. Journal of Banking & Finance, 35(7), 1794–1810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2010.12.002 Haniffa, R. M., & Cooke, T. E. (2005). The impact of culture and governance on corporate social reporting. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 24(5), 391–430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2005.06.001 Hart, S. L. (1995). A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 986–1014. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1995.9512280033 Hasan, M. S., & Omar, N. (2015). The impact of firm's level corporate governance on market capitalization. Journal of Investment and Management, 4(4), 119–131. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jim.20150404.11 Helfaya, A., Morris, R., & Aboud, A. (2023). Investigating the factors that determine the ESG disclosure practices in Europe. Sustainability, 15(6), Article 5508. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15065508 Hongming, X., Ahmed, B., Hussain, A., Rehman, A., Ullah, I., & Khan, F. U. (2020). Sustainability reporting and firm performance