Geometric transformations are one of the essential topics in mathematical learning, as they support students’ spatial reasoning, spatial visualization, and understanding of geometric relationships. Despite its importance, many students still have difficulties in interpreting transformation concepts beyond routine procedural exercises, particularly problems that are presented in unfamiliar or contextual situations. Therefore, this study aimed to explore students' learning obstacles in learning geometric transformations and examine their implications for the development of didactical design. Qualitative approach with a didactical design research framework was employed using a phenomenological perspective. Participants involved were 36 ninth-grade students and one mathematics teacher from a junior high school in West Bandung Regency, Indonesia. Research data were collected through a written test on mathematical spatial ability consisting of four contextual problems, a semi-structured interview, and a praxeological analysis of a textbook. The written-test instrument was validated by two mathematics education experts and one experienced teacher before implementation. The data were analyzed using the Miles and Huberman interactive model, involving data reduction, display, and conclusion drawing, to categorize students’ difficulties into epistemological, ontogenic, and didactical obstacles. The research revealed that students experienced interconnected categories of learning obstacles. Epistemological obstacles appeared in students’ inability to concept generalization, misconceptions of the transformations’ properties, and dependence of procedural examples. Ontogenic obstacles related to limited spatial relations ability, weak understanding of Cartesian coordinates, and difficult to interpret contextual problems. Lastly, didactical obstacles emerged from teacher-centered instructions, limited use of interactive visual media or technology, and emphasis on procedural completion compared to conceptual exploration. These obstacles interacted with one another and influenced students' understanding of geometric transformations. The study implies that effective didactical design should integrate conceptual understanding, spatial visualization, multiple representations, contextual learning, and dynamic technology to facilitate meaningful learning of geometric transformations. Keywords: learning obstacles, geometric transformation, epistemology, ontogenic, didactic.
Pebi Pitri Anasari, T. Turmudi, D. Suryadi et al.· Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA· 0 citations
Self-efficacy has been one of the most widely used psychological constructs in mathematics education research for over three decades. However, the development of research, the intellectual structure of the field, and its relationship to learning approaches and mathematical competence have not been comprehensively developed. This study aims to analyze publication trends, thematic structures, and identify research gaps regarding self-efficacy in mathematics education. The study uses a bibliometric approach to 3,096 Scopus Open Access documents from 2013–2025 that have been screened to ensure their relevance to the field of education. The analysis was conducted using Bibliometrix (R) to broadcast publication performance and VOSviewer to map the co-word network. The results show sharp and consistent growth (Annual Growth Rate 20.47%), with Frontiers in Psychology as the most published platform (197 documents) while EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education remains the most relevant core journal for the mathematics education audience specifically. The co-word mapping identified four thematic clusters—self-efficacy, mathematics teaching and achievement; health and behavior; clinical education and medical competence; as well as procedures and pilot studies. However, the most pedagogically significant finding is the lack of explicit integration between self-efficacy, team-based learning, and mathematical communication in the context of statistics education: combined phrases such as ‘collaborative learning in statistics’ and ‘communication skills in mathematics’ were completely absent (n = 0) among all the documents analyzed, while the individual terms rarely appeared alongside self-efficacy. This finding confirms that research interventions that integrate collaborative learning with self-efficacy strengthening in statistics courses—particularly in higher education contexts that are still underrepresented in the global literature such as Southeast Asia—represent a pressing research agenda and have the potential to make significant pedagogical contributions to the teaching of mathematics and statistics in higher education.
Nike Astiswijaya, T. Turmudi, Kusnandi Kusnandi et al.· ISEJ : Indonesian Science Ed...· 0 citations