Skip to content

Author

Timothy P. Hanna

2 papers indexed here

We haven’t gathered this author’s papers yet. Follow them and we’ll fetch their work.

Not the right person? Other researchers publish under this name.

Open access Jul 2026

A population-based study of the diagnosis to treatment interval and overall survival for stage I non-small cell lung cancer treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy

Background: Lung cancer is one of the most diagnosed cancers and the leading cause of cancer-related deaths in Ontario. For patients with medically inoperable stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is recommended. However, there is limited evidence on how the diagnosis to treatment interval (DTI) impacts survival, which is relevant to inform health policy and improve patient outcomes. Objective: To investigate the association between DTI and survival for patients with stage I non-adenocarcinoma NSCLC treated with SBRT in Ontario. Methods: We conducted a population-based retrospective cohort study using linked ICES health administrative datasets, applying recently published international consensus-based methodology recommendations for investigating the association between cancer DTI and overall survival (OS). The cohort included Ontario patients with stage I NSCLC diagnosed between January 1, 2010, and June 30, 2019, treated with curative SBRT. Patients with adenocarcinomas were excluded because of histological diversity uncontrollable within the available data. A 5 month from diagnosis landmark time was used to limit immortal time bias and the wait time paradox. Kaplan Meier analysis was used to visualize survival. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the association between DTI and OS and cancer-specific survival (CSS), adjusting for relevant factors.  Results: The cohort included 532 patients with a median DTI of 61 (interquartile range: 46-79) days. Kaplan Meier analysis suggested longer DTIs were associated with worse OS. In adjusted Cox models, each 1-week (aHR=1.04 (95% CI=1.01–1.08)), and 4-week (aHR=1.19 (95% CI=1.03–1.38)) increase in DTI was associated with worse OS. Similarly, each 1-week (aHR=1.05 (95% CI=1.01–1.10)), and 4-week (aHR=1.22 (95% CI=1.03–1.45)) increase in DTI was associated with worse CSS. Findings remained robust in sensitivity analyses. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that efforts to shorten DTI may improve patient survival in this population.

Cassidy Laub, Paul Nguyen, M. Jalink et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

The diagnosis to surgery interval and overall survival in patients with cervical cancer.

IMPORTANCE Evidence regarding the association of the diagnosis to treatment interval (DTI) and survival can inform clinical care and health policy. Data in this regard are currently lacking for cervical cancer. OBJECTIVE To examine the relationship between the DTI and overall survival (OS) in a contemporary cohort of cervical cancer patients receiving curative surgery. METHODS We conducted a retrospective cohort study using population-based data of incident cases of cervical cancer diagnosed January 2008-September 2023 followed to December 1st, 2023 in Ontario, Canada. Eligible patients were > 18 years of age with stage I-III disease who received curative surgery. Multivariable Cox Proportional Hazards regression analyses were performed to evaluate the association between the DTI and OS adjusting for important confounders. The DTI was modeled categorically and using restricted cubic splines to visualize non-linear relationships. RESULTS 1501 incident cases of cervical cancer receiving curative surgery were included. The majority of patients were diagnosed with stage I disease (n = 1185, 79%). The median DTI was 80 (60-107) days. After multivariable adjustment, the hazard ratio (HR) estimates were elevated for the shortest and longest DTIs: >2-6 weeks HR: 2.33 (95%CI 1.14-4.77); >22-26 weeks HR: 1.76 (95%CI 0.59-5.27); in comparison to the middle referent interval >10-14 weeks. The restricted cubic splines exhibited a U-shaped pattern of risk, with higher effect estimates among the lowest and highest DTI values. CONCLUSION In this population-based study we did not find that prolonged DTIs to be significantly associated with poorer survival. Cautious interpretation of the results is needed given the potential impact of the waiting time paradox.

M. Jalink, W. King, Christopher M. Booth et al. · 0 citations