Skip to content

Author

Xuyao Feng

3 papers indexed here

We haven’t gathered this author’s papers yet. Follow them and we’ll fetch their work.

Not the right person? Other researchers publish under this name.

Making Implicit Premises Explicit in Logical Understanding of Enthymemes

A pipeline that integrates a large language model to generate intermediate implicit premises based on the explicit premise and claim, a neuro-symbolic reasoner based on a SAT solver to determine entailment, and a neuro-symbolic reasoner based on a SAT solver to determine entailment is proposed.

Xuyao Feng, Anthony Hunter · 2 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Aug 2026

Identifying Implicit Premises for Logical Reconstruction of Argument Graphs

A neuro-symbolic pipeline is proposed that uses large language models to generate intermediate implicit premises that are translated into logical formulae and used with logical formulae representing explicit premises and explicit claims to show the logical relationships between them (entailment, contradiction, or neutrality).

Xuyao Feng, Anthony Hunter · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Aug 2026

Pairwise Logical Selection of Enthymeme Completions under Semantic-Link Uncertainty

Arguments often omit premises or claims, forming enthymemes. We study pairwise logical selection between two candidates for the omitted component. Existing natural language methods can identify or generate candidates but often do not expose how the selected candidate completes the inference, while logic-based approaches usually assume that the required formulae and background knowledge are available. We extend a prior neuro-symbolic pipeline from missing-premise to missing-claim selection and replace binary entailment outcomes with logical-resistance scores. Top-Link uses weighted Partial MaxSAT under a single configuration of highest-confidence semantic links. We then introduce Possible-World Atom-Link Formalization (PWAL), which keeps translated formulae fixed and marginalizes logical resistance over alternative cross-formula semantic-link configurations. We evaluate PWAL on five tasks: ARCT and a CDED-derived task for missing-premise selection, iDebate- and AAE2-derived tasks for missing-claim selection, and alphaNLI for abductive hypothesis selection. Relative to Top-Link, PWAL raises strict accuracy by 2.95-30.86 percentage points and reduces tie rates by 4.57-58.00 percentage points on all five tasks. When ties receive half credit, accuracy still increases by 0.45-6.04 percentage points. PWAL also records the translated formulae, sampled link configurations, and resistance components for every comparison, providing a transparent trace of each score.

Xuyao Feng, Antonis Bikakis · 0 citations