Functional genomics–guided design of CAR-T and CAR-NK therapies in hematological malignancies: aligning cellular engineering with immune escape and microenvironmental resistance
Background Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy has changed the treatment landscape of relapsed or refractory hematological malignancies, but primary non-response and post-infusion relapse remain frequent clinical problems. In aggressive B-cell lymphomas, acute leukemias, and multiple myeloma, treatment failure is often driven by overlapping mechanisms rather than a single resistance pathway. These include antigen loss or reduced antigen density, impaired immune recognition, defective inflammatory signaling, checkpoint-mediated suppression, metabolic stress, and limited effector-cell persistence within suppressive disease niches. Main Body Genome engineering has become an important tool for both identifying and addressing these resistance mechanisms. CRISPR-based functional screening, single-cell perturbation approaches, and multi-omics profiling allow immune escape and tumor microenvironment-mediated resistance to be defined more functionally, rather than inferred only from correlative datasets. These insights can inform the design of CAR-T and CAR-NK therapies through multi-target or logic-gated receptors, checkpoint or exhaustion-pathway editing, cytokine-supported and armored constructs, metabolic fitness enhancement, and selected multiplex-editing strategies. In parallel, CAR-NK cells, universal allogeneic CAR-T products, and stem-cell-derived platforms may provide additional options in relapse-prone or heavily pretreated patients, particularly when autologous T-cell fitness, manufacturing feasibility, or repeat dosing is a concern. Conclusion A resistance-guided approach may help align engineered cellular therapy design with the dominant mechanisms of treatment failure in high-risk hematological malignancies. Rather than simply increasing engineering complexity, future CAR-T and CAR-NK development should link each modification to a measurable resistance mechanism, a feasible biomarker, and a clinically testable benefit. Prospective validation, genomic safety assessment, manufacturing consistency, and long-term monitoring will be essential before resistance-matched cellular immunotherapy can be broadly integrated into clinical practice.