Large language models (LLMs) increasingly handle in-context learning (ICL) tasks where a long, novel context defines the rules, knowledge, and output schema for a series of questions. On benchmarks that grade against every detail of the context, even strong open-weights models pass only 12-16% of tasks: a single overlooked rule fails the whole response. We argue this brittleness is structural: the dominant"read-and-reason"paradigm asks the model to extract, plan, generate, and self-verify in one forward pass. We therefore ask whether explicit context compilation can fix it, how it compares to existing long-context strategies (gist retrieval, multi-agent self-play), and where the resulting harness benefit holds across task structure and model scale. We propose the Context Compilation Architecture (CCA), whose central novelty is a typed intermediate representation (IR) with fixed slots (rules.{must_do, must_not, conditional}, output_spec, available_tools, data_profile) into which any prose context is compiled once; executable verifiers and a violation-gated correction loop follow as downstream consequences. On CL-bench (1,899 tasks across 4 open base models), CCA outperforms vanilla prompting and two long-context baselines (ReadAgent-P, Ctx2Skill) on every base model, lifting Kimi K2.5 from 15.4% to 21.4% with gains concentrated on rule-dense sub-categories. Code and cached completions are available at https://github.com/TonyQJH/cca-emnlp2026.
Jin-Hu Qi, Minda Hu, Wen-Tao Zhang et al.· 0 citations
Fine-tuning Large Language Models (LLMs) has become a crucial technique for adapting pre-trained models to downstream tasks. However, the enormous size of LLMs poses significant challenges in terms of computational complexity and resource requirements. Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) has emerged as a promising solution, yet a gap remains between the practical performance of low-rank adaptations and their theoretical optimum. While recent works have explored iteratively merging LoRA adapters, they lack a principled theoretical framework to guide adapter design. In this work, we propose eXtreme Gradient Boosting LoRA (XGBLoRA), a novel framework grounded in gradient boosting theory. Our key insight is that the adapter must adhere to the weak learner principle-each individual adapter should have limited expressiveness---to ensure that the iterative ensemble can effectively raise the model's performance ceiling without overfitting. We provide theoretical analysis establishing convergence guarantees and expressiveness bounds, which formally justify why weaker (lower-rank) adapters, when properly combined, can match or exceed the performance of stronger (higher-rank) ones. Extensive experiments on natural language processing tasks demonstrate that XGBLoRA with rank-1 updates consistently outperforms standard LoRA with significantly fewer trainable parameters.
Yifei Zhang, Hao Zhu, Haoran Shi et al.· Proceedings of the 32nd ACM...· 0 citations