Skip to content

2 papers indexed here

We haven’t gathered this author’s papers yet. Follow them and we’ll fetch their work.

Not the right person? Other researchers publish under this name.

Open access Aug 2026

A Cognitive Linguistic Study of the Semantic Evolution of Salty in American English

Taste words provide an important window into the interaction among embodied experience, cognitive mechanisms, and sociocultural factors in semantic change. From a cognitive linguistic perspective, this study investigates the major senses, diachronic relationships, and cognitive motivations of the adjective salty in American English. The Corpus of Historical American English (COHA) serves as the primary data source, supplemented by evidence from historical dictionaries. All instances of salty returned under the specified search conditions were collected and examined after proper names, duplicates, OCR errors, and contextually indeterminate cases had been excluded. The results show that the central meaning of salty is “containing salt” or “having a salty taste.” On this basis, the word has developed meanings associated with marine and coastal environments, sailors and maritime life, evaluations of speech and style, personal character and behavior, and emotional states such as annoyance, dissatisfaction, and resentment. These senses do not constitute a simple sequence in which one meaning replaces another; rather, they form a radial polysemy network in which older and newer senses coexist. The marine-environment sense is metonymically extended to sailors and their stereotypical characteristics, while the perceptual intensity of taste motivates metaphorical descriptions of vivid, pungent, blunt, or offensive language. Recurrent contextual inference from speech and behavioral evaluation further contributes to the conventionalization of the emotional sense. The semantic evolution of salty is therefore jointly motivated by embodied experience, conceptual metaphor, conceptual metonymy, pragmatic inference, and sociocultural transmission.

Zhong-Yao Wang, Yu Wang · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Constructional Shift in Translating Hong Lou Meng: A Case Study of the Yang and Hawkes–Minford English Translations

This study investigates constructional shifts in two influential English translations of Hong Lou Meng: the version by Yang Xianyi and Gladys Yang and the Hawkes–Minford version translated by David Hawkes and John Minford. Drawing on Construction Grammar and cognitive approaches to translation, the study adopts a qualitative comparative case-study design to examine how source-language constructions are reconfigured in the two translations. The analysis focuses on three textual domains: culturally loaded terms, poetic structures, and dialogue and narrative voice. Constructional shifts are examined across syntactic, lexical, semantic, pragmatic, and stylistic dimensions, with particular attention to their effects on semantic fidelity, cultural representation, literary style, and target-language readability. The analysis shows that the Yang version generally exhibits a stronger tendency to retain source-text structural relations and culturally specific meanings, whereas the Hawkes–Minford version more frequently employs restructuring, explicitation, and stylistic adaptation to enhance accessibility and literary fluency in English. These recurring differences reveal distinct translational orientations rather than a simple opposition between literal and free translation. The study argues that constructional shift provides an integrated framework for explaining how linguistic form, conceptual organization, cultural meaning, and literary function are reconstructed across languages, thereby contributing to the study of literary translation from a construction-based perspective.

Zhong-Yao Wang, Yu Wang · 0 citations