Abstract Academic peer review is in crisis—it is a structural reality that every editor, reviewer, and conscientious author now navigates daily. The symptoms are familiar: reviewer fatigue, inconsistent decisions, declining response rates, and a growing sense that the machinery of scholarly quality assurance is straini...
Zeynep Engin, J. Crowcroft, Stefaan Verhulst· Data & Policy· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.