Foundation models place language throughout embodied agents, but its presence does not show what it contributes or how well that contribution is grounded. This survey separates these two questions. We define five non-exclusive functional roles for language: Specification, Embodied Representation, Action Orchestration, Grounding Regulation, and Execution Coupling. For each role, we trace the path from linguistic content to its embodied consumer and identify the observations or interventions that can test the claimed responsibility. Applying this framework to the reviewed literature reveals a recurring gap between functional use and evidential support. Interpretable or revised linguistic intermediates may be incorrect, go unused, or fail to affect later behavior. Even when actions are directly conditioned on language, system-level success does not by itself isolate language's contribution. We therefore evaluate grounding claim by claim, asking whether the reported evidence supports the specific responsibility assigned to language. Using role claims rather than architectures as the unit of comparison allows us to compare modular and end-to-end embodied agents without extending conclusions beyond the reported evidence.
Yifan Guo, Chenghao Li, Zhu Wang et al.· 0 citations
Logistics Cyber-Physical Systems (LCPS) generate large volumes of regulatory and operational texts that encode early signals of safety risks. Converting short, noisy, and domain-specific records into actionable intelligence is difficult due to industrial semantic drift and the limited auditability of black-box predictors. This paper proposes Neuro-Symbolic Logistics Risk Awareness (NS-LRA), a dual-channel framework that integrates lightweight semantic perception with constraint-aware topological reasoning. NS-LRA first maps raw texts to a standardized schema of $K=20$ risk nodes using a dual-weighted embedding mechanism that combines TF-IDF and Word2Vec to mitigate short-text sparsity. It then constructs a directed risk graph by fusing co-occurrence evidence with a domain constraint mask, and derives hierarchical propagation via ISM level partitioning with deep-driver identification via MICMAC analysis. We evaluate NS-LRA on $N=8,435$ records, validated against an annotated subset $(\mathcal{D}_{\text{ann}}=1,500)$) with Fleiss' $\kappa=0.82$ and an expert-defined gold graph. NS-LRA achieves Micro-$\mathrm{F} \mathrm{1}=\text{0. 8 7 9}$ for risk mapping and approximately $22 \times$ lower perrecord CPU latency than fine-tuned BERT on the same test split under the same environment. For topological inference, NS-LRA reports $\text{E P}=\text{0. 9 2 4}$ and $\text{T C}=\text{0. 9 5}$ against the gold graph. These results indicate that NS-LRA can provide an efficient and traceable pipeline for proactive risk governance in LCPS.
Ke Huang, Yan Liu, Bin Guo et al.· Annual International Compute...· 0 citations
Hierarchical Interaction MOdeling for zero-shot generalist GAD enables anomaly detection across diverse graph domains without retraining or access to target-domain supervision by modeling the evolutionary trajectories of node representations across hierarchical structural depths, thereby capturing interaction patterns that exhibit strong cross-domain stability.
Xiangping Zheng, Xuan Feng, Bo Wu et al.· Proceedings of the 32nd ACM...· 0 citations
