Skip to content

Author

Zhong-Ji Chen

1 paper indexed here

We haven’t gathered this author’s papers yet. Follow them and we’ll fetch their work.

Not the right person? Other researchers publish under this name.

Open access Jul 2026

Efficacy and safety of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors versus chemotherapy or cetuximab in the treatment of platinum-refractory recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis

Introduction This meta-analysis was designed to compare the efficacy and safety of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors versus chemotherapy or cetuximab in the treatment of platinum-refractory recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC). Materials and Methods Four databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library) were searched for RCTs comparing PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors versus chemotherapy or cetuximab in the treatment of platinum-refractory R/M HNSCC, from the database’s establishment to 2 January 2026. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and treatment-related adverse events (trAEs) were subjected to meta-analyses. Results Five RCTs were included in the meta-analysis. The meta-analysis included a group of 1,700 patients diagnosed with platinum-refractory R/M HNSCC. Within this cohort, 926 patients were administered PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors, while 774 patients received chemotherapy or cetuximab. Compared with chemotherapy or cetuximab, PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors yielded superior OS (HR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.72 to 0.89, P < 0.01), lower incidence of grade 3–5 trAEs (RR: 0.37, 95% CI: 0.30 to 0.45, P < 0.01) and any grade trAEs (RR = 0.74, 95% CI: 0.69 to 0.79, P < 0.01). There was no statistically significant difference in the ORR (RR: 1.01, 95% CI: 0.71 to 1.51, P = 0.94) or PFS (HR: 1.00, 95% CI: 0.90 to 1.11, P = 0.99) between the two groups. Conclusion The results indicated that PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors were effective for platinum-refractory R/M HNSCC particularly in populations with high PD-L1 expression and exhibited a superior safety profile compared to chemotherapy or cetuximab. Additional well designed RCTs are required in the future to validate our conclusion. Clinical Trial Registration https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251020053, identifier PROSPERO (CRD420251020053).

Zhong-Ji Chen, Zhong Zhong, Weiming Liang et al. · 0 citations