A composite structural index summarises a network in one number, and for a triangle-based index it is spectrally redundant: Tr(A^3) is the third moment of the adjacency spectrum. The non-redundant content sits one level down, in diag(A^3), which depends on eigenvectors and is not spectrally determined. A corollary in the theory paper predicted that the global scalar should tie sharpened spectral baselines rather than beat them, while the node-wise attribution should do better where the number of structural epicentres is unknown. We construct Omega-N by localizing each of the four factors. The direct localization is badly conditioned; two corrections from published practice fix it, a configuration-null excess per factor and a personalized-PageRank neighbourhood at several scales, giving ten interpretable features per node, with no attributes, training or embeddings. Against a recursive feature engine at five levels of recursion, Omega-N wins on three and ties on two of the six in-domain evaluations, the sixth a declared null where every arm returns chance, with ten features against its 28 to 252 before pruning. Two statistics from the graph and labels, not from performance, partition the eight benchmarks without error, and the two they exclude are the two on which it loses. The strongest application is drug-target prioritisation on protein interaction networks: +0.032 to +0.103 AUPRC over a six-feature centrality battery and +0.084 to +0.208 over the four-feature one, across three constructions, replicated on an independent AP-MS network and label source (degree-matched: +0.0723 on STRING, +0.0560 on BioPlex, p=0.00195). Adding Omega-N to centralities plus Node2Vec changes nothing. The claim is narrow and it is the point: ten named features, computed without training, match or beat hand-crafted centralities and a recursive engine, and do not touch learned representations.
E-commerce search ranking must balance multiple objectives--relevance, user engagement, and platform revenue--when allocating impression slots to competing listings. Estimating the expected revenue component is well understood for fixed-price items, but becomes challenging when marketplace inventory includes mixed listing formats such as pure auctions and hybrid "Auction with Buy It Now" (ABIN) items, where prices evolve dynamically and the final transaction value is unknown at ranking time. Yet auction and ABIN listings account for a meaningful share of inventory and transaction volume on platforms such as eBay, and are a popular format for individual sellers and for unique items with unclear value. We extend the standard Expected Cost-per-Mille (eCPM) framework to auction and ABIN listings by deriving a marginal eCPM (meCPM) that captures the incremental value of showing one more impression of an item whose price is still evolving. The resulting formulation extends the familiar fixed-price eCPM--which is already inherently marginal--to auction dynamics, allowing unified ranking of fixed-price, auction, and ABIN listings under a single objective. We then describe a practical production implementation that approximates this objective, addressing cold-start challenges by bootstrapping from existing engagement models. Online A/B tests at a large e-commerce platform showed positive revenue gains and statistically significant improvements to user metrics, and the system was deployed to production.
Autonomous and intelligent transportation systems operate in complex urban environments where safety depends on interactions among vehicle behavior, environmental conditions, and vulnerable road users (VRUs) such as pedestrians and cyclists. Most advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) employ reactive mechanisms that activate only after hazards have emerged, a critical limitation underscored by rising VRU fatalities in the United States. This study introduces PRISM (Proactive Risk Intelligence and Safety Management), an agentic multi-model safety architecture that transitions from reactive crash avoidance to proactive, continuous risk management. PRISM employs inverse crash-probability modeling to convert binary crash classifiers into dynamic, interpretable safety scores. Three specialized models addressing trajectory kinematics, environmental risk, and VRU interaction operate concurrently, coordinated by a reasoning layer incorporating reinforcement learning, contextual memory, and feature-level attribution. The system provides graduated safety interventions across four tiers, from silent monitoring to emergency alerts. Unlike rule-based systems with static thresholds, PRISM dynamically adjusts safety parameters in real time. Validated across 1,296 scenarios from three naturalistic driving datasets without dataset-specific retraining, the system yielded a mean safety score of 68 out of 100, classified 77.6% of scenarios as advisory, and flagged a near-miss rate of 3.8%, with 11% of scenarios escalating to intervention or emergency response. Feature attribution consistently identified trajectory risk and VRU proximity as primary safety factors. PRISM provides a unified, interpretable framework for proactive transportation safety with emphasis on VRU risk reduction in dense urban environments.
Artificial intelligence (AI) increasingly treats scientific literature as a data source for building databases, training predictive models, and guiding discovery. Yet literature-derived datasets often assume that reported experimental values are internally consistent and directly reusable. Here, we analyze this assumption using solid electrolyte (SE) conductivity data as a representative materials-science case. By tracing values from source articles to curated datasets, we identify recurrent text-figure mismatches, ambiguous axis annotations, unit inconsistencies, and missing measurement context. These discrepancies are often numerically plausible and therefore difficult to detect through routine preprocessing, but they can propagate as structured label noise during database construction and machine-learning reuse. A cross-database example shows how ambiguous reporting can create a 100-fold conductivity error. Our analysis reframes data accuracy as an infrastructure requirement for artificial-intelligence-driven discovery and motivates traceable reporting, curation, and validation practices for reusable scientific data.
Keywords: AI for science; Data reliability; Scientific databases; Structured label noise; Literature-derived data; Materials informatics; Solid electrolytes
Qian Wang, Ying Li, Ryuhei Sato et al.· 0 citations
Reach audiences
Advertise in front of researchers, engineers, and readers.
Telecom Service and Network Operations Centers (SNOCs) rely on large collections of cloud documents, including Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs), vendor technical manuals, incident reports, and configuration guides, to maintain uninterrupted network operations. During critical incidents, engineers must quickly retrieve accurate information, yet traditional keyword based and single stage retrieval approaches often struggle to provide precise results.
This paper presents Athena for Cloud Knowledge Base, a fully offline, multi agent Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) framework designed for enterprise cloud document search in Vodafone Idea's SNOC environment. The system integrates dense retrieval using E5 Large V2 embeddings, BM25 sparse retrieval, and Knowledge Graph expansion within a LangGraph based orchestration framework. Retrieved candidates are fused using Weighted CombSUM, followed by cross encoder reranking and Maximal Marginal Relevance (MMR) to obtain a diverse and relevant evidence set.
To improve answer reliability, the framework performs per chunk LLM evaluation with explicit attribution verification, assessing each MMR selected chunk independently before generating a response. Unsupported or weak evidence is discarded, and if no chunk satisfies the verification criteria, the system automatically evaluates multiple chunks together as a fallback. Experiments on a corpus of 4200 SNOC cloud documents containing 312000 indexed chunks show that the proposed approach achieves an MRR at 10 of 0.910 and an Exact Match (EM) score of 78.4 percent, outperforming single stage dense retrieval by 14.6 percentage points. The entire pipeline operates in a fully offline environment, satisfying enterprise data sovereignty requirements while delivering accurate and grounded responses for cloud document search.
Speech brain-computer interfaces (speech BCIs) translate neural activity into language, offering a path towards restoring speech for people with paralysis and, more broadly, enabling new forms of natural human-computer interaction. Despite this promise, the field lacks a common measure of progress because systems use different datasets, recording methods, types of speech, and vocabularies, so their reported scores are rarely comparable. Underlying this measurement problem are two unresolved questions: (i) what distribution of words should a speech BCI enable a user to communicate, and (ii) how much information from this distribution can a system convey. We address both by deriving open-vocabulary mutual information (OVMI), an information-theoretic quantity that measures the information conveyed by a decoder relative to a reference distribution over the words a user may wish to communicate. This allows capabilities measured under different conditions, such as distinct vocabularies, to be evaluated on a common communication scale. We show that ordinarily reported accuracy, word error rate (WER), and other metrics computed only over the words a system supports can overstate how much of a user's intended speech the system can communicate. We then use OVMI to compare existing systems, expose trade-offs between how much of the user's language a system supports and how accurately it decodes those words, show that these comparisons depend on what the user is expected to communicate, and demonstrate that selecting a vocabulary to maximise OVMI yields up to 16.3% relative improvement in accuracy across three speech domains. OVMI therefore provides the speech BCI community with a principled way to compare heterogeneous systems, improve vocabulary design, and measure progress in the field.
Dulhan Jayalath, Benjamin Ballyk, Oiwi Parker Jones· 0 citations
We introduce the Graph Machine (GM), an architecture that maintains an $O(n)$-sized state and accesses it through sparse, dynamic routing. Unlike methods with fixed-size states or sparse but static routing, GM preserves $O(n)$ complexity in its sparse layers without restricting the potentially accessible state size to $O(1)$. Instead, GM uses edges - pointer-like objects updated differentiably by a referral mechanism resembling pointer chasing. We replace 75% of the dense Transformer layers in Qwen3-0.6B with GM sparse layers and pretrain from scratch on 15.7B tokens. With only 2 of 4,096 tokens retrieved per KV head in each sparse layer, loss degrades only slightly; with 4, the best model marginally improves loss.
LLMs are trained to generate natural language. However, various strands of evidence indicate that an LLM's externalized linguistic outputs and mechanistically-extracted linguistic features can be an unreliable lens for understanding internal model computation. We introduce the term ``linguistic illegibility'' to broadly refer to scenarios in which an LLM's externalized or mechanistically-probed language artifacts fail to represent how the model actually thinks. We argue that the specter of linguistic illegibility is unavoidable for LLMs whose internal computations are not directly expressed via language, but rather math over activation spaces (with lossy translations between activation spaces and natural language happening at the bookends). If linguistic illegibility is always possible, then security mechanisms that rely on a model's linguistic self-reporting (e.g., chain-of-thought monitoring, constitutional self-critique, activation probing for linguistically-defined feature vectors) can never be completely sound; the model sandbox will always need isolation techniques whose guarantees do not depend on reading a model's linguistic state at all. We argue that observing a model's outputs using taint tracking is a promising approach for an effective sandbox: regardless of how a model linguistically self-reports, a taint tracking policy can define, a priori, various pieces of system state that should never be influenced by model-produced data. We also discuss several additional sandboxing mechanisms (e.g., robust virtualization, third-party auditing of sandboxing configurations) which collectively provide a critical floor beneath linguistic monitoring, and would have mitigated recent sandbox exploits by frontier models.
Stable 4-bit floating-point (FP4) pretraining is difficult because the E2M1 payload represents only a narrow range of magnitudes. NVIDIA's Transformer Engine \nv{} recipe addresses this with current-tensor scaling, a randomized Hadamard transform (RHT), and bfloat16 (BF16) final layers, adding work outside the FP4 matrix multiplications. We instead pair E2M1 payloads with unsigned E5M3 (\ue{}) block scales. Their wider range permits periodic tensor scaling, while our recipe applies selective stochastic rounding to backward gradients, omits RHT, and uses FP4 in all eligible internal linears. We pretrain a Nemotron-H 8B model for nearly 190 billion tokens. Compared with Transformer Engine \nv{}, the proposed block-16 recipe finishes with lower final-window training loss and, under their respective quantized-inference policies, lower validation loss measured as held-out negative log-likelihood. Its quantized-inference downstream point estimates are also higher on all three reported aggregates. A native \nv{} execution ablation that jointly removes RHT and the BF16 final-block exemption increases measured model-body token throughput by 21.2\%. These results demonstrate end-to-end software-emulated \uefp{} pretraining with a simpler recipe and motivate native support for \ue{} block scaling.
Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) has emerged as a powerful paradigm for large language model (LLM) post-training, but its reliance on coarse outcome rewards leads to limited guidance on intermediate reasoning processes. Existing approaches such as process reward modeling and on-policy distillation introduce additional constraints, such as reliance on a specialized reward model or assuming identical reasoning patterns between teacher and student. Nevertheless, we observe that once a reasoning process first goes wrong, evaluating the subsequent reasoning provides limited additional information, as it is already conditioned on an invalid prefix. Therefore, we propose Cliff, a reward shaping strategy that utilizes an off-the-shelf LLM as a teacher to identify the first mistake in each rollout. As a result, the rollout is naturally decomposed into two parts: a correct prefix and an incorrect suffix. Cliff then converts this signal into token-level advantages, assigning positive advantages for the correct prefix and negative feedback afterward. Experiments across 12 different scenarios demonstrate that Cliff consistently improves reasoning performance, outperforming on-policy distillation by 15% and standard GRPO by 7%, even with teachers of modest capability. Furthermore, we analyse the role of ``ground truth''in Cliff and investigate its training dynamics. These results establish Cliff as a simple, general and effective approach for improving RLVR with richer, fine-grained supervision.
Peixuan Han, Runnan Wang, Ketan Ramaneti et al.· 0 citations
Tabular foundation models (TFMs) learn to fill in tables the way language models fill in text, and tables are arguably the format in which most physical measurement arrives. Did they learn any physics in the process? They are Bayesian by construction, so the question is what their prior contains. We probe it directly, evaluating four of them (TabPFN-3, TabICLv2, TabDPT and Real-TabPFN-2.5) against six baselines on datasets sampled from 316 physical equations, in and out of domain. TFMs dominate, out of the box and after tuning. But we show that their prior can represent neither a noiseless mechanism nor physical units, which is why they interpolate physics without yet being able to act as physical models.
Wassim Tenachi, Y. Hezaveh, L. P. Levasseur et al.· 0 citations
Low-rank adaptation (LoRA) is the standard way to fine-tune large models, yet when its two factors are trained independently, the update ignores the geometry of the low-rank weight change it induces. We introduce LoRA-TSD, an optimizer that treats every LoRA step as a tangent vector of the fixed-rank matrix manifold and takes the spectral-norm steepest-descent step of Muon inside that tangent space, mapping the result back to the factors through a retraction native to the LoRA parametrization. The step avoids expensive operations on full weight matrices, and its retraction is up to $2.8\times$ cheaper than the truncated-SVD retraction used by prior manifold methods. We prove that the Frobenius-norm version of our surrogate recovers LoRA-Pro, and we identify the tangent-projected gradient, the Riemannian gradient of the manifold, as the stationarity measure natural to LoRA training and computable from the factor gradients alone. Under this measure we give the first global convergence guarantees for both LoRA-Pro and LoRA-TSD, with rates that drive the factor-gradient norms to zero. Across six commonsense and natural-language-inference benchmarks with Llama-3.2-1B, Llama-3.1-8B and Qwen3-32B, LoRA-TSD outperforms every competing LoRA optimizer and stays robust to the adapter rank. Code is available at https://github.com/brain-lab-research/LoRA-TSD.
Dmitrii Andriianov, Andrey Veprikov, Aleksandr Beznosikov· 0 citations
A weeklong summer workshop brought higher education faculty to campus to explore how AI and machine learning materials can be adapted for their classrooms.
A new machine-learning framework aims to improve the success rate of computational protein design while moving away from results that reproduce sequences found in nature.
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduAug 24, 2026
