Skip to content
Preprint

Causal Survival Forests with Negative Controls

Aug 2026 · 0 citations · 38 references
Mathematics

Abstract

We study heterogeneous treatment-effect (HTE) estimation in observational survival studies commonly associated with both censored outcomes and unmeasured confounding. We integrate causal survival forests (CSF) with negative controls (NC) from proximal causal inference and introduce Negative Control Causal Survival Forests (NC-CSF), a flexible nonparametric HTE learner for survival analysis. Our approach uses a loss that incorporates proxy variables and Neyman orthogonalization to train the random forest, thereby mitigating bias from unobserved confounding and gaining robustness to nuisance estimation. Through extensive simulations spanning varying levels of confounding, proxy relevance, and censoring mechanisms, we demonstrate that NC-CSF substantially reduces bias and estimation error relative to existing baselines. We further demonstrate the practical utility of our method on various clinical datasets, where it confirms several existing findings and also reveals new interpretable patterns of treatment-effect heterogeneity. To facilitate practical use, we provide an end-to-end Python implementation of NC-CSF that carefully handles implementation details such as nuisance estimation and clipping.

View source

Similar papers

Open access Sep 2026

Outcome-Adaptive Lasso for Cox Proportional Hazards Model.

While randomized controlled trials remain the gold standard for estimating causal effects in medical research, they are not always practical. Consequently, observational data become a necessary alternative, though it introduces confounding bias due to the lack of randomization. Propensity score modeling mitigates this...

Fan Liu, Juan Liu, Hong Wang · 0 citations
Preprint Sep 2026

Doubly valid and doubly sharp sensitivity analysis to unobserved confounding for survival outcomes

Time-to-event outcomes are central in oncology and rare diseases, where treatment effects are often summarized by differences in survival curves or Restricted Mean Survival Time (RMST). In real-world data, estimating these causal effects relies on the absence of unobserved confounding, an assumption that is rarely sati...

Jean-Baptiste Baitairian, Bernard Sebastien, R. Jreich et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Nonparametric Efficient Estimation of Dynamic Treatment Regimes with Competing Risks

This work develops the nonparametric efficiency theory and derive the efficient influence function for the cumulative incidence of an event under a DTR in the presence of a competing risk and right-censoring and proposes a sequentially doubly robust estimator that accommodates flexible machine learning for nuisance est...

Nitya Shah, Laura D. Carbone, Howard A. Fink et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Oct 2026

Surrogate-powered Causal Inference with Censored Outcomes

Clinical trials with survival endpoints lose information when participants are censored before death is observed. We develop target-preserving estimators that use posttreatment disease history, such as recurrence or progression, to recover information lost to censoring for marginal survival and restricted mean survival...

Yaroslav Mukhin, Tereza Oprea, Arielle Anderer et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Doubly robust estimation of causal survival effects via inverse probability of treatment and censoring weighting and semi-parametric AFT models with variable selection.

Clinical trials and observational studies frequently encounter survival data with right censoring and high-dimensional confounders. This article proposes several estimators for assessing the average causal effect of a binary treatment on survival outcomes in the presence of confounders. These include doubly weighted es...

Chien-Lin Su · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.