Skip to content
Open access

Hybrirank: A Dual-Axis Algorithm Ranking Framework via Dataset-Based and Preference-Guided Rank Fusion

Sep 2026 · International journal of computer information systems and industrial management applications · Vol 18, pp. 106-128 · 0 citations

TL;DR

Hybrirank is a hybrid framework that ranks algorithms by integrating two components, dataset-based benchmarking module that evaluates performance on varied domain-specific datasets using standard metrics, and a user preference modeling module that captures user-defined priorities through structured input.

Abstract

Algorithm selection remains a challenging task due to the absence of standardized tools that support informed decision-making for identifying suitable algorithms for AI and ML tasks. It plays a crucial role in designing and deploying intelligent systems. This paper presents Hybrirank, a hybrid framework that ranks algorithms by integrating two components, dataset-based benchmarking module that evaluates performance on varied domain-specific datasets using standard metrics, and a user preference modeling module that captures user-defined priorities through structured input. The system supports clustering, classification, and regression tasks, and allows users to generate rankings based on dataset performance, user preferences, or both. Each mode produces a context-aware ranking tailored to its input. In hybrid mode, HybrirankFramework leverages its core fusion mechanism to integrate data-driven performance and user priorities to generate a more selective and user-aligned recommendation. This ranking serves as a decision-support system, enabling users to select the most appropriate algorithm. Hybrirank offers a dual-layered evaluation process that enhances recommendation relevance, bridges the gap between empirical performance and practical needs, and it supports optimal selection guided by both data and priorities.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access 2026

Hodge-Guided Active Preference Elicitation for Efficient Pairwise Ranking

Pairwise comparison is a standard method for eliciting user preferences in recommender systems and group decision-making. The number of required comparisons grows quadratically with the number of alternatives, creating a substantial burden for users and platforms. This paper asks whether Hodge decomposition, which spli...

Eskander Bejaoui, M. O. Aoueileyine, R. Bouallègue · 0 citations
#machine learning Review Sep 2026

Data Processing for Offline Evaluation in Recommender Systems: a Survey

A systematic, cross-domain characterisation of data processing practices for the offline evaluation of recommender systems is provided, identifying substantial heterogeneity in how auxiliary information is prepared and represented, as well as inconsistencies in the specification of data splitting protocols.

Alberto Carlo Maria Mancino, Angela Di Fazio, Danilo Danese et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

HARP: Hierarchical Adaptive Ranking with Preference-Adaptive Fusion for Query-Based CVE Prioritization

Vulnerability prioritization is inherently preference dependent, since the same CVE can receive different remediation priority under different operational preference scenarios. Existing scoring systems and ranking methods typically assume a fixed criterion. In practice, organizations already operate under a preference...

Hao-Chen Liu, Zheng-Zhang Chen, Hao-Yu Wang et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Oct 2026

RecSoup: Efficient Model Merging Approach for Controllable Multi-Objective Recommendation

Recommender systems often need to balance multiple conflicting objectives. Controllable Multi-Objective Recommendation (CMOR) enables dynamic adjustment of objective trade-offs at inference time without retraining, adapting to shifting user or system requirements. Existing CMOR approaches typically rely on output-level...

Zi-Dong Jia, Guo-Fu Xie, Xiao Zhang · 0 citations
Review Sep 2026

Decision-Oriented Recommendation Reranking: An Empirical Study of Its Promise and Limitations

Large language models (LLMs) have shown promise for recommendation reranking, but their use introduces an important trade-off between recommendation quality and serving efficiency. We investigate whether decision-oriented systems provide a useful alternative when the reranking task is fundamentally a structured choice...

Hanjia Lyu, Ying-Long Xia · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.