Skip to content
#software testing Conference Open access

AI-Assisted Software Testing: Opportunities and Challenges

Sep 2026 · Exploring Science Academic Conference Series · 0 citations · 11 references

TL;DR

It is argued that AI is unlikely to fully replace human testers in the near future and should be used as an assistant that supports human judgment in software quality assurance.

Abstract

Software testing has played an important role in checking software reliability, security, and quality. However, testing has remained one of the most costly and time-consuming parts of the software development life cycle, especially as modern systems have b ecome larger and more frequently updated. Traditional manual testing depends on human experience, while automated testing still requires testers to write and maintain many test scripts. This paper reviewed the opportunities and challenges of AI-assisted software testing based on selected academic studies, technical reports, and industry examples. The review found that AI techniques, such as machine learning, search-based optimization, fuzzing, and large language models, can support testing tasks such as test generation, defect prediction, code analysis, test prioritization, and debugging. These applications may reduce manual effort, improve test coverage, and help teams identify risky components earlier. At the same time, the review identified several challenges, including limited data quality, weak generalization across projects, low interpretability, false positives, integration difficulties, and risks related to LLM outputs. The paper argues that AI is unlikely to fully replace human testers in the near future. Instead, AI should be used as an assistant that supports human judgment in software quality assurance.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Review Open access Sep 2026

Artificial Intelligence-Driven Software Test Automation: A Comprehensive Survey

This paper focuses on two key tasks—AI-driven test case generation and defect detection—and provides a systematic review of the technological evolution from traditional automation to intelligent testing, contrasting traditional deep learning and large language model approaches in defect detection.

Jia-Lei Chen · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

An Intelligent Framework for AI-Based Automated Software Testing and Defect Prediction

The analysis indicates that combining predictive defect-risk scores with automated test selection can potentially reduce redundant testing, concentrate computational resources on high-risk software components, and improve feedback speed, but model reliability depends on historical defect data, feature quality, distribu...

Haruto Tanaka, Yuki Nakamura · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Automated Quality Assurance in Web Applications Using Model-Based Testing and Cypress with AI-Assisted Test Generation

An automated quality assurance framework that combines Model-Based Testing (MBT), a modeling approach to designing and generating test cases based on system models with AI-assisted test generation strategies using the Cypress testing platform is outlined.

Bhuvan Chandra Kasarapu · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Leveraging Generative AI in Software Development: Advantages and Difficulties

The paper is trying to deeply analyze the pros and cons of implementing GenAI into software development, analysing current applications used in software development life cycle (SDLC), drawing upon case studies and programmer experience, and examining effect on code quality, team working and project timeline.

P. Arun, Jagdale, Deepti Ameta et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

AI-Powered Test Automation Frameworks for Next-Generation Software Quality Engineering

A conceptual evaluation indicates that AI-assisted regression testing can improve the alignment between code changes and test execution priorities, reduce redundant execution, and create feedback loops capable of adapting to changing Agile projects.

Tomas Kazlauskas · 0 citations
#software testing Preprint Sep 2026

How effective are traditional test criteria at detecting bugs in large language models generated code?

An empirical study involving 5 Large Language Models and 4 benchmarks evaluates the effectiveness and efficiency of 3 widely used adequacy criteria: statement coverage, branch coverage, and mutation testing, finding that mutation testing only marginally outperforms traditional coverage criteria in both triggering and d...

Asma Hamidi, Michael Konstantinou, R. Degiovanni et al. · 0 citations

Related blog posts

Microsoft Research Blog Oct 12, 2026

Simulating student learning for better AI tutoring

StudentSim is a research system for evaluating and improving AI tutoring tools before they are tested with learners. It models how individuals may engage with tutors, giving feedback to improve tutor performance across subjects like chess, writing, and mathematics. The post Simulating student learning for better AI tutoring appeared first on Microsoft Research.

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 2, 2026

Documenting the tech worker movement

Writing as a participant and researcher, PhD student JS Tan SM ’22 has co-authored a new book about the rise of tech worker protests and the employer backlash that followed.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.