A new harness self-evolution method, named DREvo, is proposed, which integrates function-level evidence anchoring, state-dependent evidence recalibration, and role-conditioned search intent distillation to determine which historical evidence remains valid and where the harness should evolve next.
Abstract
Harness plays a critical role in large language model agent performance, and building a high-performing harness requires substantial expert effort. Therefore, recent research has increasingly explored harness self-evolution, which iteratively proposes, evaluates, and improves harnesses using historical trial experience. However, accumulated historical experience does not always translate into stable search guidance, and performance often fluctuates substantially across evolution iterations, making it difficult to reliably discover high-performing harnesses under a limited evolution budget. We identify two limitations in how existing harness self-evolution methods leverage historical experience: (1) Lack of dynamic reassessment of whether historical experience remains valid for the current harness, and (2) Lack of explicit mechanisms for translating valid historical experience into actionable search directions. To address these limitations, we propose a new harness self-evolution method, named DREvo, which integrates function-level evidence anchoring, state-dependent evidence recalibration, and role-conditioned search intent distillation to determine which historical evidence remains valid and where the harness should evolve next. Under limited evolution budgets, DREvo exhibits smoother evolution trajectories, achieves the highest accuracy on all five benchmarks, and delivers average gains of 16.2% and 14.2% over the evaluated baselines on domain reasoning and agentic tasks, respectively.
In harness self-evolution, agents modify their own prompts, code, tools, and orchestration while keeping the underlying language model fixed. Recent work has shown that agents can improve themselves in response to task failures and achieve substantial performance gains. However, gains on failed tasks do not automatical...
Qi Cai, Yong-Gang Zhang, Jun Nie et al.· 2 citations· ⚡2
This formulation enables a systematic study of key self-improvement factors through the proposed Evo-Harness, and provides a principled understanding of how LLM agents can effectively learn on the fly.
Tian-Xin Wei, Zhan Shi, Min-hua Lin et al.· 10 citations
Evo-Bench is the first benchmark designed to evaluate models'intrinsic harness-evolving capabilities across Search, Office, and General agent domains, and exposes critical temporal anomalies like early saturation, while demonstrating that the synthesized harnesses act as highly transferable reasoning structures, consis...
Autonomous agents powered by large language models (LLMs) continuously accumulate experience through interaction, creating an opportunity to improve future behavior through self-evolution. A fundamental challenge is how to transform abundant, task-specific interaction experience into reusable model competence without s...
Wen-Bo Gao, Zhao-Mou Song, Zhi-Yuan Ji et al.· 0 citations
This paper introduces HarnessEvolve, a self-evolving framework that learns from reference trajectories to achieve reliable agent self-evolution, and overcomes credit assignment failure by generating reference trajectories and aligning failed executions against them to extract error signals.
Wen Jiang, Ming-Min Chu, Yiding Tian et al.· 5 citations
Self-evolving agents convert interaction feedback into persistent artifacts, such as memories or skills, which in turn guide subsequent decisions. As these artifacts are iteratively updated throughout an experience stream, the capabilities they support may evolve. Consequently, endpoint performance alone offers an inco...
Hong-Qiang Lin, Chao Liu, Xiao-Fan Bai et al.· 1 citation
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.