Latent trait models differ less in what they measure than in what they fix. Item response theory frees the trait from the items administered but, in doing so, surrenders the origin and unit of the scale to convention. The Cognitive Trait Model (CTM; Choi, 2022) restores both by bounding the trait on [0, 1], where 0 denotes an ignorance level and 1 a mastery level defined by the task domain. We generalize the derivation behind CTM into a family indexed by the mastery anchor $L$: the published model is the case $L = 1$, while the limit $L \to \infty$ gives a half-truncated link with an absolute origin but no ceiling. Origin before unit. Bounded support admits Gauss-Legendre quadrature without truncation error, so item and person parameters follow from Bayes modal EM rather than MCMC. On identical data and priors this reproduces the published estimates ($\theta$ correlation 0.9999) while running 35 times faster than a converged random-walk sampler and 73 times faster than NUTS; a single adaptive-testing update costs about five microseconds. Applied to the time axis, the same link becomes a four-parameter growth curve spanning accelerating, decelerating, plateauing and declining trajectories, though not non-monotone ones. The family reduces to a reparameterization of the logistic model only when all items share a slope, so a measurement advantage is possible in principle; three simulations find none, locating the contribution in interpretation and computation rather than in measurement itself. In the LSAT reanalysis, examinees with perfect scores read 67%, 75% or 100% of mastery depending on the estimator -- the criterion-referenced claim is meaningful only with its uncertainty attached, and the coordinate is not in general the proportion of the domain a person can perform.
A latent severity has a bounded lower tail with density of shape alpha and scale L. It is observed only through a fixed Markov kernel K that is biased and non-additive. The relative conditional spread of K diverges at the endpoint. Our sample is i.i.d. from the marginal Q alone, with no anchoring covariate or instrumen...
We propose a regression model for the extreme tail of a response variable, in which covariates rescale the tail without changing its shape. A single covariate-dependent function then characterizes the entire conditional tail, in contrast to extreme quantile regression, which targets a quantile at a pre-specified level....
This paper proposes Wasserstein Causal Forests (WCF) for settings in which each unit's outcome is itself a probability distribution. This study also defines finite-grid transformed average and conditional average treatment effects, including a reference-distance contrast that asks whether treatment moves unit-level dis...
Local genetic correlation is estimated as a ratio of a local genetic covariance to the geometric mean of two local heritabilities. LAVA, the standard implementation, returns that ratio only where both traits clear a univariate heritability test at P < 0.05, a rule its documentation presents as a stabiliser. We show tha...
Can a restricted computational model predict well while omitting distinctions required by its explanatory task? We define boundary sufficiency relative to an outcome, a representation, and a declared family of input interventions. Exact sufficiency requires a common response law on every fiber of the retained represent...
The standardized mean difference (SMD) is a workhorse effect-size index across psychology, education, and the behavioral sciences, but its denominator embeds estimand-level commitments-about reliability, sample heterogeneity, and the reference scale on which the effect is interpreted-that are rarely made explicit. We t...