Skip to content
Preprint

VortexChat: An agentic framework for autonomous multi-objective integrated photonic design

Aug 2026 · 0 citations · 45 references
Computer Science Physics

TL;DR

Results demonstrate that an LLM agent can assume key aspects of expert decision-making in photonic inverse design while maintaining physical fidelity and fabrication feasibility, providing a scalable route towards autonomous design of complex integrated photonic systems.

Abstract

The advancement of modern integrated photonics is frequently bottlenecked by device design workflows that rely heavily on manual simulation and expert intuition. While inverse design offers an alternative, it remains constrained by expert supervision and a lack of end-to-end automation. To address these issues, we present VortexChat, an agentic framework for the autonomous, end-to-end inverse design of integrated photonic devices directly from natural language specifications. VortexChat couples a large language model (LLM) decision agent with topology generation, gradient-based refinement, and full-wave electromagnetic simulation. This closed-loop architecture enables the system to iteratively decompose design objectives, orchestrate computational tools, and update strategies based on feedback with minimal human intervention. Constrained by the absolute metrics of the Vortex100 Benchmark, VortexChat autonomously generates devices that strictly meet all predefined performance thresholds without any human-in-the-loop. As an experimental demonstration, we fabricated a broadband terahertz perfect vortex beam multiplexer, autonomously designed by VortexChat, with measurements confirming high-efficiency operation, high mode purity and low inter-channel crosstalk in agreement with full-wave simulations. These results demonstrate that an LLM agent can assume key aspects of expert decision-making in photonic inverse design while maintaining physical fidelity and fabrication feasibility, providing a scalable route towards autonomous design of complex integrated photonic systems.

View source

Similar papers

Review Jul 2026

WARA: A Closed-Loop Multi-Agent Framework for Wireless Optimization Autoresearch

Comparative results show that WARA substantially outperforms one-shot LLM generation and approaches the quality profile of recently accepted peer-reviewed papers, demonstrating the potential of closed-loop artifact control for end-to-end LLM-assisted wireless optimization research.

Yuancheng Guo, Yilong Chen, Chao Hu et al. · 0 citations
#machine learning Review Aug 2026

A Comprehensive Review of Large Language Models for Nanophotonics: From Surrogate Modeling to Autonomous Design

This review surveys how Large Language Models are adding semantic interfaces, code generation, and tool orchestration to established numerical nanophotonic workflows, and looks ahead to the next generation of multimodal foundation models with physical perception capabilities.

Huanshu Zhang, Kegeng Tang, Lei Kang et al. · 1 citation
Preprint Aug 2026

AgenticECO: An Agentic Framework for ECO on 3D Integrated Circuits

As Moore's law slows, the industry is turning to three-dimensional integration; yet in merged 3D-IC flows, routed designs expose bond-level defects with no 2D analogue, and post-route engineering change orders (ECO) remain manual, expertise-bound work. Worse, the standard edit-then-fully-reroute practice entangles a repair with router churn, so a signoff number cannot be attributed to the edit that motivated it. We present AgenticECO, an evidence-gated tool-using agent workflow for 3D-IC ECO on the open-source TaiWei flow, paired with EcoRoute, a minimal-disturbance ECO-routing layer that drives the unmodified pinned router so a repair is attributable to its edit. Across nine matched natural defect cases under identical budgets, AgenticECO clears seven versus two for both full reroute and stock repair, at 0.66\% mean disturbance over cleared cases and zero clock nets touched, and a cross-backbone rerun under the same sealed contract clears all nine. Controlled studies show that the repair moves are necessary under preservation, that occupancy-aware choice buys legal landings rather than repair success, and that under tightened clocks minimal disturbance flips accept versus reject. Three preregistered visual studies localize the pixel instrument's edge to contested landing sites, and a preregistered blind diagnostic exactly restores every held-out injected defect, the only arm with zero wrong edits. Every accepted result passes routing, fresh extraction, max/min timing, DRC, and structural-equivalence gates. Code, environment, and per-episode audit artifacts are released as supplementary material.

Shuo Ren, Yaohui Han, Libo Shen et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

LUCID: An Agentic AI Framework on Digital-Twin in the Loop for QoS-Guaranteeing Robotic Control

Cloud robotics relies on the timely uplink of high-volume sensing streams, yet dynamic environments continually shift the feasible combinations of trajectories, active-robot count, and per-robot QoS. Because existing approaches formulate trajectory planning (TP) and radio resource management (RRM) as a single fixed optimization problem, they cannot reconfigure these coupled decisions as conditions evolve, resulting in transient QoS violations. However, evolving operator intents change which quantities-such as the active-robot count and per-robot QoS-are fixed, optimized, or relaxed. Furthermore, the computational cost of evaluating trajectory-dependent wireless conflicts has made it difficult to build large-scale Digital-Twin-in-the-Loop (DITL) testbeds responsive enough for such dynamic orchestration. We present LUCID, an LLM-agent--orchestrated, uplink-aware cloud-robotics pipeline that moves TP--RRM from solving a fixed formulation to dynamically orchestrating optimization problem schemas within a DITL environment. Driven by the operator's high-level intent, LUCID treats the TP--RRM formulation as a bounded template whose variables, objectives, and constraints are dynamically configured, while SimBridge enables repeated ray-tracing evaluation by converting large-scale robotics scenes into wireless-ready DTs. By integrating collision-free path planning with a spectral-radius RRM validator, LUCID identifies wireless bottlenecks and restructures the problem schema on the fly to efficiently find the verified feasible state. Experiments confirm that LUCID robustly adapts to changing intents, active-robot counts, and scenes, while a multimodal surrogate model, FastConfigNet, reduces planning latency.

Unknown authors · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Deploying Frontier Agentic Technology in MOOSEnger, a Multiphysics-Capable AI Assistant

The Multiphysics Object-Oriented Simulation Environment (MOOSE) is an open-source finite-element framework for building multiphysics simulation applications. Using a multiphysics environment effectively demands specialized expertise, creating a barrier for many domain scientists and engineers. MOOSEnger, developed at Idaho National Laboratory (INL), is a domain-specific, tool-enabled AI agent built for the MOOSE Framework. This work extends MOOSEnger with a harness focused on locally-hosted models. The harness gives the agent a full pipeline: it retrieves contextual knowledge from the MOOSE repository, validates and diagnoses the resulting input through interaction with the simulation executable environment, and extracts and stores lessons in a persistent memory. The resulting framework is demonstrated on an engineering problem from the National Reactor Innovation Center Virtual Test Bed (VTB), illustrating its potential to support realistic multiphysics simulation workflows. Additionally, the agent performance is evaluated on different categories including diffusion, Navier--Stokes, phase field, plasticity, porous media flow, solid mechanics, transient heat transfer, and reactor mesh generation. Each category consists of 25 prompts/cases. We compare MOOSEnger-Gemma4 against MOOSEnger-GPT-5.2, alongside baseline Gemma4 and GPT-5.2 without agentic capabilities. MOOSEnger-GPT-5.2 shows a slight edge, achieving a 90\% success rate versus 76.5\% for MOOSEnger-Gemma4. The baseline models perform far worse, at just 5\% (GPT-5.2) and 0\% (Gemma4), underscoring the impact of the agentic harness.

Zaid Abulawi, Mengnan Li, G. Giudicelli et al. · 0 citations