Skip to content

Prognostic Implications of the 2025 ASE guidelines for the Evaluation of Left Ventricular Diastolic Function in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction and Atrial Fibrillation.

Sep 2026 · Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography · 0 citations
Medicine

TL;DR

In patients hospitalized for HFpEF with persistent AF, LAP classification was associated with HF hospitalization, implying clinical relevance of the 2025 algorithm-based approach in this challenging population.

Abstract

Background

Non-invasive assessment of left atrial pressure (LAP) remains difficult in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). The American Society of Echocardiography (ASE) updated the Recommendations for the Evaluation of Left Ventricular Diastolic Function and introduced a specific algorithm for LAP estimation in AF. We retrospectively investigated the prognostic value of the new algorithm-based LAP assessment in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and persistent AF.

Methods

This study included 363 patients hospitalized for acutely decompensated HFpEF who had persistent AF at discharge. LAP was categorized as normal, elevated, or indeterminate using echocardiography at discharge, according to the algorithm in the 2025 ASE guidelines. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were constructed to assess associations between LAP classification and clinical outcomes such as death, heart failure (HF) hospitalization and stroke during follow-up of 574 days.

Results

LAP was classified as elevated in 93 patients (25.6%) and normal in 165 (45.5%), while it was indeterminate in 105 (28.9%) cases due to missing variables recommended in the 2025 guidelines. Elevated LAP was independently associated with HF hospitalization during follow-up period (HR 1.57, 95% CI 1.05-2.37, p=0.03), whereas it was not identified as an independent predictor for death or stroke after adjustment. This association remained significant after accounting for the competing risk of death and was largely preserved across multiple imputation and sensitivity analyses using different assumptions for indeterminate cases. The incremental value of LAP estimation for predicting HF hospitalization over natriuretic peptides was modest and not statistically significant.

Conclusions

In patients hospitalized for HFpEF with persistent AF, LAP classification was associated with HF hospitalization, implying clinical relevance of the 2025 algorithm-based approach in this challenging population.

View source

Similar papers

Aug 2026

Left Atrial Stiffness Index for Refining Diastolic Stress Test Selection in Suspected Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction.

LASI is a resting echocardiographic marker associated with positive DST and may help refine pre-test selection for DST among patients with suspected HFpEF, particularly those with intermediate HFA-PEFF scores.

Minkwan Kim, J. Seo, S. Bae et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Association Between Left Atrial Enlargement and Atrial Fibrillation in Elderly Patients with Left Ventricular Diastolic Dysfunction

Background: Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) is associated with chronically elevated left ventricular filling pressures that promote left atrial (LA) remodeling and increase the risk of atrial fibrillation (AF). Because AF is frequently asymptomatic during its early stages, identifying echocardiographic ma...

A. Al-Alwany, Faris Kadhim, Mohammed Imad Salim et al. · 0 citations
Aug 2026

Physiological Left Atrial Staging and the Risk of New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.

The proposed LA staging framework offers mechanistic insights into how the LA adapts to progressive diastolic dysfunction in HCM and is associated with a graded risk of NOAF and may help tailor AF surveillance strategies.

Jaehyun Lim, I. Hwang, Ji-Hyun Kim et al. · 0 citations
Aug 2026

Diagnostic Value of Left Atrioventricular Coupling Index and Left Atrial Stiffness Index for Left Ventricular Diastolic Dysfunction in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease: A Comparative Study Based on the 2025 ASE Guidelines.

Both LACI and LASI demonstrate good diagnostic value for LVDD in patients with CKD, with LASI showing superior performance and the combined use of both parameters significantly improves diagnostic sensitivity.

Xiaobo Chen, Yuanli Wang, Yong-Quan Huang et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.