Skip to content
Open access

Prognostic Value of the Grace Score in Patients Admitted for Acute Coronary Syndrome: An Observational Study of 94 Patients

Sep 2026 · Cardiology and Angiology An International Journal · 0 citations

TL;DR

A higher GRACE score was strongly associated with in-hospital mortality and demonstrated excellent discrimination for this outcome, and these findings should be considered preliminary and require external validation in larger multicentre Moroccan and North African cohorts.

Abstract

Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is a major cardiovascular emergency associated with a significant risk of mortality and short- and long-term cardiovascular complications. The heterogeneity of clinical presentation necessitates early risk stratification to identify high-risk patients and tailor therapeutic management. The GRACE (Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events) score is one of the main validated tools for prognostic stratification in patients with ACS. We conducted a retrospective observational study of 94 patients hospitalised for ACS in the cardiology department of the Marrakech University Hospital. Demographic data, cardiovascular risk factors, and clinical, electrocardiographic, laboratory, and echocardiographic data were collected. The GRACE score was calculated at admission. Patients were stratified into risk categories according to standard cut-off points. The primary endpoint was in-hospital mortality. The discriminative performance of the GRACE score was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. The main cardiovascular risk factors were diabetes (51%), dyslipidaemia (49%), smoking (47%), and hypertension (35%). ACS with ST-segment elevation accounted for 62% of cases. The mean GRACE score was 134.2 ± 39.1 points and the median score was 132 (IQR, 114.5–138.5). In-hospital mortality was 13.8% (13/94). The GRACE score was significantly higher among patients who died than among survivors (208.9 ± 53.3 vs. 122.2 ± 17.4 points; p < 0.001). ROC analysis showed excellent discrimination for in-hospital mortality, with an AUC of 0.996 (95% CI, 0.985–1.000). In this single-centre Moroccan cohort, a higher GRACE score was strongly associated with in-hospital mortality and demonstrated excellent discrimination for this outcome. Given the small sample size and limited number of deaths, these findings should be considered preliminary and require external validation in larger multicentre Moroccan and North African cohorts.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access Sep 2026

Prognostic Value of the ACTION ICU Score Compared to GRACE and TIMI Scores in Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes

Non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS) represent the primary manifestation of acute coronary syndromes, accounting for 60% to 70% of hospital admissions. Effective management in the emergency department (ED) relies on accurate risk stratification to guide triage. While established scores like GRAC...

Héla Ben Turkia, Ibtissem Ben Taher, Raja Fadhel et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Predictive Accuracy of TIMI, HEART, and GRACE Scores for Coronary Artery Disease Severity in NSTEMI/Unstable Angina – A Prospective Study from an Academic Emergency Department in Rural India

The findings suggest that commonly used clinical risk scores may provide some insight into angiographic disease burden, but should not be considered as substitutes for anatomical assessment.

Bibitha Susan Varghese, N. M. Nedungalaparambil, L. Fischer et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Incremental Prognostic Value of the Triglyceride–Glucose Index Beyond the GRACE Score for Predicting 30-Day Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in non ST-elevation myocardial infarction Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Background: The Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) score is widely used for risk stratification in patients with non–ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). However, it does not account for metabolic factors such as insulin resistance, which may contribute to residual cardiovascular risk. The triglyc...

F. Zahra, C. A. Andra, A. H. Raynaldo et al. · 0 citations
Oct 2026

[Phenotypic stratification of acute coronary syndrome patients based on metabolic and renal profiles: Prognostic insights from a hospital study].

BACKGROUND Acute coronary syndromes are characterized by substantial heterogeneity in clinical presentation and outcomes. Conventional prognostic scores are useful but may not fully capture the biological complexity of patient profiles. OBJECTIVE To assess whether stratifying patients admitted for acute coronary synd...

M. Fissah, S. Bennouar, F. Menzou et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Simple risk stratification of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: based on the modified DanGer shock trial-derived criteria assessed at initial emergency room presentation.

We aimed to investigate association of three DanGer Shock trial criteria [systolic blood pressure [SBP] < 100 mmHg, lactate ≥ 2.5 mmol/L, and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 45%] on clinical outcomes among patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in Japan and evaluate whether these criteria...

Narumi Irie, Y. Sawayama, Mikitaka Fujita et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Evaluation of Clinical SYNTAX Score in Predicting New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation and Long-Term Prognosis in Patients Hospitalized with Non-ST Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction

New-onset atrial fibrillation (NOAF) is a frequent complication among patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) and is associated with adverse outcomes, making early identification of predictors essential for risk stratification and management. This retrospective cohort study evaluated the prognosti...

Z. Bulat, M. E. Gokce, S. Arslan et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.