Skip to content
Open access

Data-augmented few-shot neural stencil emulation for computer-model system identification

Aug 2026 · Machine Learning: Science and Technology · Vol 7, pp. 045061 · 0 citations
Physics

TL;DR

This work proposes a more sample-efficient data-augmentation strategy for generating NPDE training data from a computer model—specifically, one using an explicit, structured-grid finite-difference numerical solver—by space-filling sampling of local ‘stencil’ states.

Abstract

Partial differential equations (PDEs) underpin the modeling of many natural and engineered systems. It can be convenient to express such models as neural PDEs (NPDEs) rather than using traditional numerical PDE solvers by replacing part or all of the PDE’s governing equations with a neural network representation. NPDEs are often easier to differentiate, linearize, reduce, or use for uncertainty quantification than the original numerical solver. They are usually trained on solution trajectories obtained by long-horizon rollout of the PDE solver. Here we propose a more sample-efficient data-augmentation strategy for generating NPDE training data from a computer model—specifically, one using an explicit, structured-grid finite-difference numerical solver—by space-filling sampling of local ‘stencil’ states. This approach removes a large degree of spatiotemporal redundancy present in trajectory data and oversamples states that may be rarely visited but help the NPDE generalize across the state space. We demonstrate that accurate NPDE stencil operators can be learned from augmented stencil training data generated by the computational equivalent of 10 timesteps’ worth of numerical simulation. Accuracy is further improved if a single full-trajectory simulation from the computer model is available, which is typically the case in practice. Across several PDE systems, we show that our data-augmented stencil data yield better trained neural stencil operators, with clear performance gains compared with naïvely sampled stencil data from simulation trajectories. Finally, using only 10 solver timesteps’ worth of augmented stencil data—with no full-trajectory simulation—our approach already matches or outperforms traditional ML emulators trained on hundreds to thousands of full trajectories in long-horizon rollout accuracy and stability. Reusing a single full trajectory within the same training budget further improves accuracy.

Read PDF

Similar papers

#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

Transolver-$\sigma$: Joint Spectral-Physical Subspace Modeling for Neural PDE Solving

Across five well-established PDE benchmarks spanning steady-state prediction and time-dependent dynamics, Transolver$ achieves state-of-the-art with a benchmark-averaged relative error reduction of 33.4% over the strongest baseline for each metric, while consistently improving autoregressive rollout over single-operato...

Haonan Shangguan, Hang Zhou, Haixu Wu et al. · 0 citations
Open access Oct 2026

Inductive bias and out-of-distribution generalization in deep learning surrogates for 2D PDE dynamics

Partial differential equations (PDEs) are a foundational tool for modeling physical systems. However, high-fidelity numerical simulations are often computationally intensive, which has prompted the development of surrogate models in the field of scientific machine learning. While recent approaches have achieved high...

Binh Duong Nguyen, Stefan Sandfeld · 0 citations
#machine learning Preprint Sep 2026

Single-condition neural solvers encode transferable response spaces for parametric differential equations

This work shows that the output Jacobian of a neural solution model trained at one condition defines a reusable response space for cross-condition solution variations, and introduces Linearized Subspace Transfer (LST) to exploit this space and recover target solutions by minimizing the target PDE-system residual over r...

Wen-Bo Cao, Wei-Wei Zhang · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

From Numerical Simulators of PDEs to Neural Emulators and Back

Simulation is central to modern engineering and science, but the cost of numerical solvers for partial differential equations (PDEs) remains a bottleneck whenever fast or many-query evaluations are required. Neural emulators trained on solver-generated data promise significant speedups, yet they are usually framed as o...

Felix Koehler · 0 citations
Open access Oct 2026

PDEformer-2: a versatile foundation model for two-dimensional partial differential equations

Partial differential equations (PDEs) are fundamental to modeling physical systems. Traditional PDE solvers are often computationally expensive. Neural operators require independent training for different PDEs, and tend to be data-greedy when adapted to new scenarios. To this end, we introduce PDEformer-2, a versatil...

Zhan-Hong Ye, Zi-Ning Liu, Bing-Yang Wu et al. · 0 citations
#machine learning Preprint Aug 2026

Physics-Integrated Operator Learning via Gaussian Splatting Representations

Neural operators provide efficient surrogates for spatiotemporal PDE systems, but purely data-driven formulations often accumulate substantial errors during long-horizon autoregressive prediction and may fail to exploit available governing-equation structure. Existing approaches incorporate physics primarily through re...

Ji-Hao Zhang, Jun-Yi Guo, Jian-Xun Wang · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.