Aug 2026· Energies· Vol 19, pp. 3744· 0 citations· 16 references
Abstract
Forecast accuracy alone is an incomplete proxy for operational value when load distributions change. This paper presents ARLOS, an auditable forecast–uncertainty–decision framework that combines static and adaptive XGBoost forecasts, rolling performance monitoring, residual-bootstrap uncertainty, and explicit fixed-margin, quantile, and risk-target operating rules. The evaluation uses 2021 for ex ante training and capacity-proxy definition and 2022–2023 for strictly sequential testing on two Ecuadorian distribution substations under a measured baseline, smooth growth, and intraday structural shift. Under the four shifted station–scenario cases, adaptive fixed-margin operation reduced the weighted operational objective by 24.8–46.0% relative to the static fixed-margin baseline; baseline-regime changes ranged from −2.5 to 11.2%, showing that adaptation is valuable primarily when mismatch is present rather than universally. A 2×2 ablation further shows that adaptation and uncertainty are distinct, non-additive sources of operational value: aggregate normalized cost changes from 0.987 for static/fixed operation to 0.650 for adaptive/fixed, 0.515 for static/quantile, and 0.546 for adaptive/quantile. Realized one-sided exceedance, computed from observed load rather than from the bootstrap sample itself, remains within 0.0039–0.0111 of the target across the controlled cases, while nominal 10–90% interval coverage ranges from 78.0% to 78.6%. A nine-substation deployment check corroborates the calibration and identifies a measured drift episode in which adaptation limits, but does not eliminate, forecast degradation. The results support ARLOS as a transparent framework for studying how adaptation and uncertainty propagate into operational consequences under distribution shift.These contributions align with Sustainable Development Goal 7 (Affordable and Clean Energy) and Sustainable Development Goal 9 (Industry, Innovation and Infrastructure) by supporting more reliable, efficient, and intelligent operation of electricity distribution infrastructure.
Short-term industrial energy forecasting supports load planning only when every predictor is available at forecast issuance. This study audits 15- and 60-minute forecasting with 35,040 real observations from a South Korean steel facility. We reconstruct a continuous 15-minute timeline, define a deployable 39-feature pr...
Esam Miftah Abdulnabi, Nabeel Faraj Amhimmid, Ashraf Faraj Saed Albarki et al.· Libyan Journal of Applied an...· 0 citations
Cross-farm adaptation can improve wind-power forecasting when target labels are scarce, but the same update can also cause negative transfer. We evaluate DART-Guard v2.1 as an empirically calibrated, reference-conditional deployment policy that separates proposal selection from release authorization and calibrates the...
Yu-Chen Zhang, Liang-Zheng Li, Yang Liu et al.· IEEE Access· 0 citations
Wind-ramp events depend on future wind speed, so their group membership is unknown when a forecast is issued. We study MS-CRACP-D, a model-agnostic online calibrator that combines candidate-response inversion, overlapping pooled and site-directional groups, and one-sided partial pooling. Under a finite interval-partiti...
Renewable forecasts are evaluated by statistical skill (e.g., CRPS), but grid operators pay for realized dispatch cost. We diagnose what drives dispatch value in a single-period newsvendor-style economic dispatch using real public data from two European transmission systems (CWE, DE-4TSO). Spatial coherence across fore...
High-renewable virtual power plants (VPPs) exhibit asymmetric operational risks stemming from net-load forecast errors: positive errors require upward reserve capacity, while negative errors can cause grid export saturation and renewable curtailment. This paper proposes RC-CVaR-H2, a linear rolling-horizon framework co...
Wei Cheng, Na Li, Lei-Lei Wang et al.· Energies· 0 citations
A Forecast-Driven Dynamic Tariff Design Framework is proposed that separates forecasting intelligence from pricing authority, embeds uncertainty management as a first-class design element, and positions a governance layer as the mandatory interface between predictive outputs and consumer-facing tariff signals.
O. Apata, Mukovhe Ratshitanga, I. Davidson· Energies· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.