Does Machine Learning Improve Wind Power Forecasting? An Experimental Investigation
TL;DR
A systematic experimental investigation that covers two complementary stages, i.e., wind speed correction and wind power forecasting, provides actionable task-specific guidance for model selection in operational wind power forecasting systems.
Abstract
Accurate wind power forecasting is essential for the stable and economic operation of power systems with high renewable penetration. Although machine learning models have been widely adopted for this task, the assumption that greater model complexity invariably yields superior forecasting accuracy has received insufficient scrutiny. This paper presents a systematic experimental investigation that covers two complementary stages, i.e., wind speed correction and wind power forecasting. For wind speed correction, we compare 10 machine learning methods, including spanning linear, instance-based, and tree-based ensemble learners, under four newly proposed progressively enriched feature configurations. For wind power forecasting, we benchmark 20 methods spanning traditional machine learning, time-series deep learning, and Transformer-based architectures on two geographically distinct wind farms. Our results reveal a clear task-dependent pattern. In wind speed correction, tree-based ensemble methods, particularly gradient boosting variants, consistently dominate, and feature engineering contributes more to accuracy gains than model selection. In wind power forecasting, deep learning architectures substantially and consistently outperform traditional methods, with attention-based models generalizing the most robustly across regimes and recurrent networks proving to be the most sensitive to regime shifts. These findings provide actionable task-specific guidance for model selection in operational wind power forecasting systems.