Aug 2026· Journal on Political Sciences & International Relations· Vol 4, pp. 1· 0 citations
Abstract
The European Union has converted domestic climate ambition into a form of global regulatory power through the European Union Emissions Trading System (EU ETS), the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM), and the European Union Deforestation Regulation (EUDR). This qualitative literature review examines whether that emerging Brussels-centred carbon order can remain environmentally effective and politically legitimate when its adjustment costs are disproportionately borne by developing economies. Drawing on journal literature published mainly since 2020, the article synthesizes scholarship on global carbon politics, the Brussels Effect, carbon leakage, border adjustment, deforestation-free supply chains, climate justice, and the right to development. It finds that EU instruments can stimulate cleaner production and improve supply-chain transparency, but also transmit measurement, reporting, verification, traceability, certification, and financing costs down value chains in regressive ways. These effects can operate as non-tariff barriers even when the measures pursue legitimate environmental objectives and are formally imposed on EU importers. Palm oil illustrates the problem clearly: although palm oil is not a CBAM commodity, EUDR and related European sustainability rules can exclude smallholders whose environmental performance may be acceptable but whose land records, geolocation data, or chain-of-custody systems remain incomplete. The article argues that durable global carbon governance requires more than unilateral diffusion of European rules. It proposes an inclusive compact based on co-design, differentiated obligations, recognition of equivalent policies, revenue recycling, technology transfer, smallholder-centred traceability, and accessible review mechanisms. Climate leadership will command followers only when decarbonization is aligned with distributive justice and credible development pathways.
This article examines the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) as a regulatory instrument of the European Union, situated at the intersection of international trade law, customs law and environmental protection. The primary objective of the study is to assess the legal nature of the CBAM, evaluate its compatibilit...
The formal implementation of the European Union’s Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) marks a critical paradigm shift in global climate governance, transitioning from cooperative multilateralism under the UNFCCC framework toward unilateral geoeconomic regulation. Grounded in the theoretical lens of International...
Hai-Xiang Liu, London· Humanities and Social Scienc...· 0 citations
The European Union’s Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) entered its definitive phase on 1 January 2026, converting an instrument of climate policy into an operative condition of market access. This paper examines what that transition means for a small, hydrocarbon-dependent open economy that is simultaneously at...
R. Abdulhasanova· Journal of Global Economics· 0 citations
Sustainability has evolved from a broad normative commitment to intergenerational welfare into a powerful architecture of standards, certification, traceability, due diligence, and market-access regulation. This evolution is essential for addressing climate change, biodiversity loss, deforestation, and social harm, bu...
L. Judijanto· Journal of Environmental Sus...· 0 citations
This publication examines the EU’s Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) and its compatibility with international climate and trade law. It finds that CBAM’s legality remains uncertain: the EU can defend it as a measure to prevent carbon leakage and fulfil its climate obligations, while developing countries have cr...
Lindsay C. Colgan, Paul Ibuzor, N. Mitchell et al.· 0 citations
Against the backdrop of intensifying global climate change and tightening carbon emission reduction policies worldwide, the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) represented by the EU has gradually become an institutional tool reshaping international trade rules and industrial division of labor. It integrates full...
Xi-Ge Zhang· Advances in Economics, Manag...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.