Aug 2026· International Conference on Methods & Models in Automation & Robotics· pp. 369-374· 0 citations· 10 references
Abstract
The development of quantum technologies opens new possibilities for the optimization of machine learning (ML) algorithms. In this contribution, we report on the experimental use of quantum computing for training ML algorithms and models designed to be deployed for inference on embedded systems with limited computational resources. Due to the small size of resource-efficient models for embedded systems, this application of quantum computing provides an excellent opportunity to evaluate a technology that is currently being developed in the noisy intermediate-scale quantum era. We develop an approach based on transforming classical supervised learning problems into a discrete form, enabling their solution using quantum annealing (QA) methods. Three models are presented: a binary XNORNet network, a support vector machine (SVM) with a discrete representation of dual coefficients, and a convolutional neural network. All experiments are performed on the MNIST dataset, using classical optimization methods, simulated annealing, and QA on the D-Wave Advantage system. While classical gradientbased methods maintain superior absolute accuracy (up to 95.97% for SVM), the D-Wave system demonstrates a significant reduction in core optimization time, achieving speedups of up to 15.6× compared to classical optimization on a central processing unit when the system overhead is excluded. Preliminary results suggest that while QA entails a slight accuracy and memory requirements penalty, a drastic reduction in active annealing duration serves as a promising strategy to reduce training latency in future embedded-focused ML applications.
Current research provides an overview of important QML algorithms, such as Quantum Support Vector Machines (QSVM), Quantum Neural Networks (QNN), Variational Quantum Eigensolvers (VQE), Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA), and hybrid quantumclassical computing techniques, which have recently become more p...
J. Chen· Recent Research Reviews Jour...· 0 citations
Together, these contributions show how learned representations, statistical control, and hardware constraints shape the exchange between quantum computing and machine learning.
An experimental demonstration of qudit-based QNN using a trapped $\rm ^{40}Ca^+$ ion is reported, which highlights the potential of qudits to QNN architectures and provides a framework for implementing qudit-based QNNs across various quantum devices.
Yi-Bo Yuan, Zhuo-Yue Xu, Zhen-Yu Du et al.· National Science Review· 0 citations
This survey provides a comprehensive overview of the theoretical foundations, unified taxonomy, and key methodologies in QML, and discusses quantum data encoding techniques, variational quantum models, neural-inspired quantum architectures, and quantum data learning approaches, along with their associated challenges an...
Ashis Kumar Pati, Rajesh Vayyala, K. Mohanty et al.· IEEE Access· 0 citations
The Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) era shows its practical applications through quantum computing which encounters essential problems with qubit stability and gate fidelity. This research introduces a complete quantum machine learning framework which uses IBM’s Qiskit toolkit to optimize quantum hardware perfo...
Sanjay Saroja Parameswaran, M. A. Rohit Surya, G. K et al.· 2026 International Conferenc...· 0 citations
Findings indicate that integrating QC with ML/DL offers faster convergence, improved optimization, secure decentralized learning, and efficient handling of large-scale and complex data.
Poornachander I, R. K. Jatoth, S. Pawar· Cognitive Computation· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.