Aug 2026· Nature Methods· Vol 23, pp. 1814 - 1826· 0 citations· 101 references
Medicine
TL;DR
This work presents SACCELERATOR, an open-source, extensible framework that formalizes expert-guided spatial clustering analysis, and proposes a consensus-guided workflow where descriptive spatial metrics highlight high-entropy regions of method disagreement, enabling targeted feedback for tissue experts.
Abstract
Spatial omics technologies have revolutionized the study of tissue architecture and cellular heterogeneity by integrating molecular profiles with spatial localization. In spatially resolved transcriptomics, delineating higher-order anatomical structures is critical for understanding how cellular organization affects function. However, the reliability of current benchmarks of spatially aware clustering (SAC) methods is undermined by their narrow focus on Visium and brain tissue datasets and the incorrect interpretation of manual annotation as ground truth. Here we present SACCELERATOR, a community-driven, extensible framework that standardizes data formatting, method integration and metric evaluation, enabling rapid inclusion of new methods and datasets. Our analysis revealed substantial limitations in the generalizability and reproducibility of SAC methods and shows that anatomical labels commonly used as ground truths are often biased, error prone and unsuitable for benchmarking. Rather than ranking methods, we propose a consensus-guided workflow where descriptive spatial metrics highlight high-entropy regions of method disagreement, enabling targeted feedback for tissue experts. Applied to brain and cancer datasets, this approach uncovered biologically meaningful patterns overlooked by individual SAC methods and manual annotations, highlighting the need for iterative, expert-in-the-loop evaluation. Benchmarking spatially aware clustering is challenging. SACCELERATOR is an open-source, extensible framework that formalizes expert-guided spatial clustering analysis.
While preserving the spatial coordinates of tissues, spatial multi-omics technologies jointly measure gene expression, protein abundance and chromatin accessibility, offering complementary molecular perspectives for deciphering tissue microenvironment heterogeneity. Nevertheless, the interwoven problems of high-dimensi...
Lin-Na Fan· Applied and Computational En...· 0 citations
Functional domain identification in spatial transciptomics transforms spatial molecular measurements into mechanistic insights into tissue physiology and pathology. However, the inherent noise and sparsity of gene expression data, along with the locality-biased design of conventional graph-based approaches, fundamental...
Seungeun Lee, Guolon Wang, Kyungtae Kang et al.· bioRxiv· 0 citations
Spatial omics (SO) technologies enable spatially resolved molecular profiling, while hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) imaging remains the gold standard for morphological assessment in clinical pathology. Recent computational advances increasingly place H&E images at the center of SO analysis, bridging morphology with transc...
Ning-Hui Hao, Boshen Yan, Dong Li et al.· Proceedings of the 32nd ACM...· 0 citations
Histopathology preserves tissue architecture, whereas spatial transcriptomics measures gene expression within its native spatial context. Integrating these modalities with artificial intelligence (AI) can link morphology to spatial molecular states and scale spatial discoveries to routine pathology cohorts. Early hemat...
Mohammad Amin Rezania, Haechan Yi, Jae-Il Choi et al.· Cancer research and treatmen...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.