Skip to content
Open access

Serial Ketamine Infusions for Treatment-Resistant Bipolar Depression: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Sep 2026 · JAMA psychiatry · 0 citations · 16 references
Medicine

TL;DR

In TRBD, adjunctive IV ketamine was well tolerated and associated with significant antidepressant effects compared to midazolam, and was well tolerated and associated with significant antidepressant effects compared to midazolam.

Abstract

Importance Antidepressant efficacy of intravenous (IV) ketamine has been demonstrated in major depressive disorder; however, the efficacy and safety of ketamine for bipolar depression remain largely unknown, with limited data available in this specific population. Objective To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of adjunctive IV ketamine compared with midazolam for treatment-resistant bipolar I or II depression (TRBD). Design, Setting, and Participants The Ket-BD study (Ketamine for Treatment-Resistant Bipolar Disorder) was an investigator-led, double-blind, midazolam-controlled randomized clinical trial conducted at 3 sites in Ontario, Canada, from July 2022 to November 2025. Participants included adult outpatients (aged 21-65 years) with a primary bipolar I or II disorder DSM-5 diagnosis with a current moderate to severe major depressive episode (Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale [MADRS] score ≥21), having had at least 2 failed trials of evidence-based pharmacotherapies. Data were analyzed from November 2025 through February 2026. Interventions Participants were randomized 1:1 to receive 4 flexibly dosed 40-minute infusions over 2 weeks of either ketamine (0.5-0.75 mg/kg) or midazolam (0.02-0.03 mg/kg) adjunctive to a stable dose of at least 1 mood stabilizer or antipsychotic. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was change in depression symptom severity measured by the observer-rated MADRS score from baseline to end of treatment (day 14). Safety and tolerability were assessed with close evaluation for potential treatment-emergent mania, hypomania, mixed features, or psychosis. Results Of 68 randomized participants (mean [SD] age, 44.4 [11.8] years; 38 female [55.8%]), 63 were included in the final efficacy analysis as 5 participants withdrew (1 ketamine, 4 midazolam) before the primary end point. In the primary efficacy analysis, controlling for sex, bipolar type, and baseline MADRS, the mean MADRS score at day 14 was significantly lower in the ketamine group compared to the midazolam group (between-group difference = -7.3 points; 95% CI, -12.0 to -2.5; P = .003; Cohen d = 0.7). No cases of mania, hypomania, psychosis, or suicide attempts were observed in either group. One case of mixed features (subthreshold hypomanic symptoms) was observed in each group. After the first infusion, 31 of 66 participants (47%) correctly guessed treatment allocation. Conclusions and Relevance In TRBD, adjunctive IV ketamine was well tolerated and associated with significant antidepressant effects compared to midazolam. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05004896.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Review Open access Sep 2026

Multimodal predictors of response to intravenous ketamine in treatment-resistant depression: toward personalized treatment in major depressive and bipolar disorders

Abstract Intravenous ketamine is a rapid-acting intervention for treatment-resistant depression (TRD) in adults with major depressive disorder and bipolar disorder (BD). While efficacy is established, a comprehensive integration of clinical, neurophysiological, biomarker, metabolic, and cognitive predictors remains lac...

Magda Malewska-Kasprzak, F. Rybakowski, M. Dmitrzak-Węglarz · 0 citations
2026

Intravenous ketamine compared to intranasal esketamine for treatment-resistant major depressive disorder. a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials for efficacy and pharmacovigilance outcomes

Treatment-resistant depression (TRD) represents a significant therapeutic challenge in psychiatry. While both intravenous (IV) ketamine and intranasal (IN) esketamine have been raised as promising medical treatments for TRD, their comparative efficacy and safety profiles remain unclear. This meta-analysis aimed to eval...

O. Aldoweesh, Reham Ghazwani, Joud Aldhahery et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

193. Efficacy and safety of adjunctive lumateperone 42 mg in major depressive disorder: pooled analysis of demographic and clinical subgroups from Phase 3 randomized placebo-controlled trials

Abstract Background Major depressive disorder (MDD) presents with highly variable clinical symptoms and treatment responses. Patient characteristics can impact treatment outcomes, making it essential to evaluate efficacy across subgroups to establish consistency of treatment effects. Lumateperone is an FDA-approved ant...

W. Earley, S. Durgam, C. Chen et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Add-on intravenous ketamine eliminates treatment lag period in severe non-treatment-resistant major depression: Rapid antidepressant and anti-suicidal effects – A randomized controlled trial

ABSTRACT Background: The 4–12 week lag period of conventional antidepressants creates critical vulnerability in severe depression, with peak suicide risk during the first month. While ketamine research has focused on treatment-resistant populations, its potential to eliminate this lag period in non-treatment-resistant...

Anand Prakash, Pranab Mahapatra, J. Pattnaik et al. · 0 citations
Review Sep 2026

Cognitive effects of ketamine and esketamine treatment for major depressive and bipolar disorder: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND Cognitive impairment is a core feature of major depressive disorder (MDD) and bipolar disorder (BD). Most conventional antidepressants do not have direct and clinically relevant procognitive effects. Ketamine and esketamine are effective in treating treatment-resistant depression (TRD). Herein, this systemat...

Ke-Lei Xiao, Yealin Woo, Christine Dri et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.