This work presents a large-scale controlled benchmark of DG for smartphone-based HAR, comprising more than 410,000 experiments across four model architectures, thirteen training objectives, five initialization strategies, four architectural configurations, and two shift scenarios: cross-dataset and cross-position.
Abstract
Smartphone-based Human Activity Recognition (HAR) models often degrade under distribution shifts caused by changes in users, devices, sensor placements, environments, and acquisition protocols. Domain Generalization (DG) addresses this problem by learning from source domains without access to target data. Existing DG methods span training objectives, representation initialization, and architectural modifications, but these components are typically evaluated in isolation despite operating at different stages of the learning pipeline. We present a large-scale controlled benchmark of DG for smartphone-based HAR, comprising more than 410,000 experiments across four model architectures, thirteen training objectives including Empirical Risk Minimization (ERM), five initialization strategies, four architectural configurations, and two shift scenarios: cross-dataset and cross-position. Results show that individual DG components provide limited and highly conditional gains. Alternative objectives rarely outperform ERM consistently, self-supervised initialization helps in specific settings, and architectural modifications, particularly Dynamic Domain Generalization, provide the clearest standalone improvements. Joint configurations, however, frequently outperform their individual components and exhibit complementary and sometimes super-additive interactions, although gains remain model- and shift-dependent. Class-level analysis shows that the strongest configurations mainly improve difficult, shift-sensitive decision boundaries. Finally, oracle checkpoint analysis reveals substantial unrealized performance: source-validation selection recovers only 53% and 26% of the available oracle gain in cross-dataset and cross-position settings, respectively. Overall, effective HAR domain generalization requires jointly designing DG components and robust model-selection strategies.
Findings provide a leakage-resistant but selection-sensitive benchmark for subject-independent DeepConvLSTM evaluation on WISDM and showed an observed class-level trade-off relative to last-timestep pooling in the evaluated comparison rather than a general architectural advantage.
Fakhrul Zidan Nurrohman, C. Dewa· bit-Tech· 0 citations
The findings show that accelerometers, gyroscopes, inertial measurement units, smartphones, smartwatches, and wearable sensors are the dominant data sources for HAR at the edge and a gradual shift from accuracy-centered evaluation toward deployment-aware assessment, incorporating latency, inference time, energy consump...
Jose Antonio Rojas Guillén, Wini Ebelin Quispe Bautista, A. Moreno· Journal of Computer Science· 0 citations
Human activity recognition (HAR) on wearable and mobile devices requires models that can operate with limited computational resources while remaining reliable under changing real-world sensing conditions. However, most TinyML-based HAR systems follow the same computational path for every input, regardless of whether an...
Hilal Akarkamçı, Mahmut Kılıçaslan· Applied Sciences· 0 citations
These results demonstrate the models’ respective strengths in capturing long-range temporal dependencies, bidirectional temporal patterns, and short-term temporal dynamics with cross-channel interactions in complex motion patterns.
Lightweight Human Activity Recognition (L-HAR), a controlled comparison of Baseline and Lightweight Temporal Convolutional Network, Transformer, and Long Short-Term Memory models using data sampled at 100Hz from three inertial measurement units (IMUs) worn by one participant is presented.
Inho Gil, Seongmin Ha, Jihwan Oh et al.· Italian National Conference...· 0 citations
These findings indicate that robust mobile affective computing is constrained not only by label availability but also by substantial participant-level variability and realistic cross-wave differences inherent in longitudinal in-situ deployments.
Pan-Yu Zhang, Minseo Park, Soowon Kang et al.· 0 citations
Machine-learning networks can learn without detailed instructions from a designer. Those that do may offer insight into how the brain reorganizes itself during learning.
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.