Aug 2026· Cancer Medicine· Vol 15· 0 citations· 171 references
Medicine
TL;DR
It is proposed that the translational potential of AI in oncology is substantially shaped by the rigor of the experimental feedback loops that constrain and refine it, thereby accelerating the delivery of more effective, personalized therapies validated through the complete hierarchy of in vitro assays, in vivo PDX models, and prospective clinical trials to patients.
Abstract
The development of novel cancer therapeutics is a protracted, costly endeavor with high attrition rates, largely attributed to tumor heterogeneity and acquired resistance. Artificial intelligence (AI) is emerging as a powerful technology to enhance the drug discovery pipeline, employing multimodal datasets to identify therapeutic targets, design de novo candidates, and discover biomarkers. However, a significant validation gap persists. AI models frequently hallucinate chemically implausible molecules, overfit to biased training datasets (particularly immortalized cell lines that poorly represent patient tumors), and generate predictions that perform poorly outside their training distribution. This gap exists because AI development has prioritized algorithmic sophistication over experimental rigor, creating an accumulation of in silico predictions without systematic biological testing. Analysis of landmark studies reveals that AI‐driven target discovery is most successful when constrained by synthetic accessibility filters and functional genomic screening, while dose optimization and combination therapy predictions require validation in patient‐derived xenografts (PDXs) that recapitulate tumor microenvironment complexity. The most clinically impactful AI applications in oncology, from immunotherapy biomarker discovery to resistance mechanism prediction, tend to employ closed‐loop discovery frameworks in which experimental outcomes iteratively retrain computational models. We propose that the translational potential of AI in oncology is not solely defined by algorithmic complexity, but substantially shaped by the rigor of the experimental feedback loops that constrain and refine it, thereby accelerating the delivery of more effective, personalized therapies validated through the complete hierarchy of in vitro assays, in vivo PDX models, and prospective clinical trials to patients.
The evolving role of AI in modern drug discovery is discussed while highlighting the importance of explainable algorithms, high-quality biomedical data, real-world evidence, and interdisciplinary collaboration.
Mohsen Zabihi· Advances in Pharmacology and...· 0 citations
This review highlights the synergy between AI and HTS, emphasizing DL techniques such as convolutional neural networks for bioactivity prediction, recurrent neural networks for de novo design, and reinforcement learning for property optimization.
K. Herbetko, Katarzyna Herbetko, Magdalena Mikołajek et al.· Future Medicinal Chemistry· 0 citations
This review emphasizes the influence of new AI platforms like AlphaFold3, molecular interactions are structurally optimized (MISATO), and ZairaChem on the discovery of oncology drugs and examines how AI reconciles chemical design with pharmacological feasibility.
Mohsin Ali, Muhammad Ali Tajwar, Farid Ahmed et al.· Medicinal research reviews (...· 0 citations
This systematic review comprehensively evaluates computational advancements in oncology drug discovery published between 1997 and 2026 and concludes that AI has transitioned into an indispensable, data-driven framework for modern oncology chemistry and structural toxicology.
anyogita Shahi, Shirish Kumar Singh, Vinod Kumar Choudhary· Asian Journal of Medical Res...· 0 citations
Drug discovery is frequently limited by high attrition rates, and poor absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, and toxicity (ADMET) profiles are a major cause of late-stage failure. Therefore, precise ADMET property prediction is necessary to develop safe and effective drug candidates. Traditional experimental assays and rule-based computational procedures are limited by their poor predictive power, cost, and time, despite providing valuable insights. Innovative strategies to deal with these issues have been introduced by developments in artificial intelligence (AI), such as machine learning (ML), deep learning (DL), graph neural networks (GNNs), generative models, and multi-task learning (MTL). AI techniques can better generalize scaffolds, capture interdependencies between pharmacokinetic and toxicological endpoints, and model complex nonlinear relationships by leveraging large, diverse datasets. Explainable AI (XAI) enhances transparency by detecting biological and structural characteristics that are relevant to predictions, even if integrated pipelines combine predictive modeling with molecular creation and optimization. AI-driven ADMET prediction is becoming a vital tool in lowering attrition, speeding up candidate prioritization, and influencing the direction of rational drug development, despite persistent issues with data quality, regulatory acceptance, and synthetic viability.
Satyam Kumar Vishwash, Ram Babu Soni, Ratima Sood et al.· Current Computer - Aided Dru...· 0 citations
Artificial intelligence is revolutionizing drug discovery by accelerating target identification, molecular design, virtual screening, and toxicity prediction, while tackling longstanding challenges like high costs and lengthy timelines in traditional pipelines. This review explores recent AI innovations—such as AlphaFold for protein structure prediction, generative models for de novo drug design, and graph neural networks for drug repurposing—alongside real-world case studies from companies like Exscientia, Insilico Medicine, and BenevolentAI, which have produced clinical candidates like DSP-1181 and rentosertib. Despite these advances, key hurdles persist, including data quality issues, model interpretability, synthetic feasibility for complex molecules, and integration with experimental workflows, underscoring the need for explainable AI, better datasets, and ethical frameworks to bridge research gaps. Looking ahead, hybrid AI-experimental approaches and collaborations between pharma giants and AI startups promise to deliver safer, more personalized therapies faster.
P. Jadhav, R. Pingale, Kanchan Gajanan Gawai et al.· International journal for ad...· 0 citations