Skip to content

Route, Don't Fix: Regime-Dependent Decoding Correction and a Trajectory-Gated Router for Reliable Clinical LLM Answer Selection

Sep 2026 · 0 citations · 21 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

ALTAS is introduced, which reads terminal entropy and late-layer linearity from one forward pass to choose per question between greedy decoding and late-layer trajectory correction and improves TruthfulQA over greedy at 3B and 8B.

Abstract

Large language models (LLMs) are often deemed unsafe for clinical question answering because of their tendency to hallucinate. Retrieval augmentation, fine-tuning, and external verifiers require new infrastructure that clinical governance must approve and may add latency or extra model calls. Inference-time correction uses the model's internal logit signals, but a fixed transformation need not suit every question. A corrector that improves accuracy by about ten percentage points on a truthfulness stress test yields negligible gains on clinical multiple-choice benchmarks, where instruction tuning concentrates output probability on one answer and leaves low terminal entropy. We introduce ALTAS, which reads terminal entropy and late-layer linearity ($R^2$) from one forward pass to choose per question between greedy decoding and late-layer trajectory correction. No classifier, probe, or head is trained; the router operates on candidate-answer logits and adds 6.5% latency overhead. Applied to every question, the correction improves TruthfulQA over greedy at 3B and 8B by 11.4 and 10.0 percentage points, respectively ($p<10^{-10}$). Gated per question, ALTAS retains gains of 8.3 to 9.5 percentage points while keeping MedQA, PubMedQA, and MedHallu within a one-percentage-point do-no-harm band, with no statistically significant differences from greedy. The method passes verification sweeps over frozen thresholds, the scoring rule, and the domain label.

View source

Similar papers

#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

Reasoning Instructions Can Break Answer Decoding in Vision--Language Models

Chain-of-thought (CoT) instructions can distort multiple-choice VLM evaluation when a scorer appends a reasoning cue but reads answer-label logits before the model generates any rationale. We call this CoT-prefix scoring. On ScienceQA, Qwen2.5-VL-7B drops from 80.76% to 45.48%, and across five option-content permutatio...

Zeyan Li, Si-Yuan Qiu, Jian-Feng Xu · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

FLIP: Final Layer Inference-Time Probing for Vision-Language Models

FLIP is a validation step for intervention-based mechanistic interpretability, not a steering method, for testing whether a logit-facing intervention site in an open-weight vision-language model (VLM) supports structured, task-linked computation rather than generic perturbation.

Drandreb Earl O. Juanico, Rowel O. Atienza · 0 citations
#natural language process... Preprint Sep 2026

TRACE: Single-Pass Decoding-Trace Risk Localization for Generation Calibration

TRACE is proposed, a single-pass, decoded-answer-preserving confidence estimator that treats decoding-time uncertainty as a trajectory through three steps: recording token-level surprisal and predictive entropy during decoding, applying local risk operators to preserve uncertainty spikes, and converting localized trace...

Yue-Bin Xu, Xue-Mei Peng, Jun-Lan Chen et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Prediction of Prediction (PoP): Inter-Layer Activation Fusion for Single-Pass Hallucination Detection in Large Language Models

Autoregressive large language models (LLMs) routinely generate factually incorrect outputs with high decoding confidence, limiting their deployment in high-stakes workflows. Existing output-stage uncertainty metrics can fail when models are overconfident on false assertions, while multi-sample verification pipelines in...

Himal Badu · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

Before the Token Commits: Trajectory-Level Benchmarking of Visual Hallucinations in Diffusion VLMs

Multimodal diffusion language models generate responses by iteratively unmasking tokens, making each answer the endpoint of a multi-step trajectory rather than an immediate commitment. Hallucination benchmarks built for autoregressive models evaluate only the final output, and therefore cannot determine whether an unsu...

Ya-Dong Wang, Si-Ping Yue, Yu Tian et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

Look Before You Leap: Factual Decoding with Internal Attribution Signals

This work identifies a factual-salient layer span within LLMs whose derived signal is selectively elevated for factual tokens and exhibits anomalous spikes at hallucination-prone steps, and proposes DescaPE, a decoding framework that leverages internal model signals to suppress hallucination-prone trajectories at infer...

Hayeong Ryu, Jungmin Yun, B. Lim et al. · 0 citations

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Sep 29, 2026

Who we become when we talk to machines

Professor Sherry Turkle’s new book, “Artificial Intimacy,” offers a withering critique of chatbots and the antisocial dynamics she believes they encourage.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.