Skip to content

Where to Compute and How to Interact: Operator-Readable Adaptation with Gauge-Aware Transport

Sep 2026 · 0 citations · 47 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

The Gauge-Aware Adaptive Mesh Neural Operator is proposed, requiring an adaptive operator to account for and test why computation is allocated to particular locations and how representations interact under the resulting nonuniform discretization, and establishes sufficient conditions for representation-consistent aggregation.

Abstract

Adaptive meshes enable neural operators for partial differential equations (PDEs) to allocate spatial samples and computation according to local physical structures. Existing approaches, however, mainly address where to compute, with less attention to how information should interact after node relocation. Mesh adaptation changes local sampling scales, neighborhood structures, and geometric contexts, so representations formed at different nodes may not be directly comparable. Direct aggregation can therefore entangle physical variation with discretization-induced representation variation. Because allocation and interaction are jointly optimized through the same output objective, their individual roles are also difficult to distinguish from final errors alone. We introduce operator readability, requiring an adaptive operator to account for and test why computation is allocated to particular locations and how representations interact under the resulting nonuniform discretization. Based on this principle, we propose the Gauge-Aware Adaptive Mesh Neural Operator (GA-AMNO). Physics-informed adaptive allocation answers where to compute, while geometry-conditioned low-rank Gauge transport maps source features into target representation contexts before aggregation, answering how to interact. This makes mesh-to-solver information exchange inspectable and intervenable. We establish sufficient conditions for representation-consistent aggregation and analyze approximate transport errors and continuity under topology-preserving mesh deformations. Experiments on five PDE benchmarks demonstrate improved predictive accuracy, while controlled interventions and geometric-mismatch analyses verify the roles of allocation and interaction and show that Gauge transport improves cross-discretization representation compatibility under strong geometric mismatch.

View source

Similar papers

#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54

Diffusion models as plug-and-play priors

The possibility of inferring high-dimensional data inference in a model that consists of a prior and an auxiliary differentiable constraint given some additional information is considered, thereby allowing a range of potential applications in adapting models to new domains and tasks.

Alexandros Graikos, Esmeralda S. Whitammer, N. Jojic et al. · 316 citations · ⚡15

Trajectory Balance: Improved Credit Assignment in GFlowNets

It is proved that any global minimizer of the trajectory balance objective can define a policy that samples exactly from the target distribution, and empirically demonstrate the benefits of the trajectories balance objective for GFlowNet convergence, diversity of generated samples, and robustness to long action sequenc...

Esmeralda S. Whitammer, Moksh Jain, Emmanuel Bengio et al. · 302 citations · ⚡60

KTO: Model Alignment as Prospect Theoretic Optimization

This work proposes a HALO that directly maximizes the utility of generations instead of maximizing the log-likelihood of preferences, and suggests that the best loss depends on the inductive biases most appropriate for a given setting, an oft-overlooked consideration.

Kawin Ethayarajh, Winnie Xu, Niklas Muennighoff et al. · 195 citations · ⚡28
#machine learning Review Open access Jun 2014

Why Early-Stage Software Startups Fail: A Behavioral Framework

This state-of-practice investigation was performed using a literature review followed by a multiple-case study approach and presents how inconsistency between managerial strategies and execution can lead to failure by means of a behavioral framework.

Carmine Giardino, Xiaofeng Wang, P. Abrahamsson · 175 citations · ⚡19

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 23, 2026

Q&A: How AI came to model the “messy” human mind

Assistant Professor Benjamin Lindquist studies how engineers deliberately injected randomness into early AI, giving rise to deep-learning models that sometimes hallucinate.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.