Skip to content

Active Learning with Bayesian Multi-Fidelity Laplace Neural Operators for Oscillatory Parametric PDEs

Feb 2025 · 2 citations · 48 references
Computer Science Mathematics Physics

TL;DR

Results demonstrate that Bayesian multi-fidelity LNOs, combined with uncertainty-guided active learning, provide a data-efficient framework for operator learning in engineering dynamical systems.

Abstract

Surrogate models of parametric dynamical systems are essential for many-query and real-time predictions in engineering applications such as design optimization and digital twins. However, generating high-fidelity (HF) training data over a broad range of parameters and operating conditions remains computationally expensive. To address this challenge, we propose a Bayesian multi-fidelity Laplace neural operator (MF-LNO) for uncertainty-aware active learning of oscillatory parametric PDEs. Specifically, the proposed Bayesian MF-LNO iteratively calibrates the discrepancy between low- and high-fidelity data, where predictive uncertainty guides the adaptive acquisition of informative HF trajectories. Such predictive uncertainty is quantified via replica-exchange stochastic gradient Langevin dynamics (reSGLD), whose broad posterior exploration enables uncertainty to serve as an error indicator for adaptive HF sample acquisition. Numerical experiments on the Lorenz system, Duffing oscillator, and beam dynamics demonstrate that uncertainty-guided HF sample acquisition consistently outperforms random sampling, while the proposed Bayesian MF-LNO achieves higher prediction accuracy than MF-DeepONet with predictive uncertainty quantification. These results demonstrate that Bayesian multi-fidelity LNOs, combined with uncertainty-guided active learning, provide a data-efficient framework for operator learning in engineering dynamical systems.

View source

Similar papers

#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54

Diffusion models as plug-and-play priors

The possibility of inferring high-dimensional data inference in a model that consists of a prior and an auxiliary differentiable constraint given some additional information is considered, thereby allowing a range of potential applications in adapting models to new domains and tasks.

Alexandros Graikos, Esmeralda S. Whitammer, N. Jojic et al. · 316 citations · ⚡15

Trajectory Balance: Improved Credit Assignment in GFlowNets

It is proved that any global minimizer of the trajectory balance objective can define a policy that samples exactly from the target distribution, and empirically demonstrate the benefits of the trajectories balance objective for GFlowNet convergence, diversity of generated samples, and robustness to long action sequenc...

Esmeralda S. Whitammer, Moksh Jain, Emmanuel Bengio et al. · 302 citations · ⚡60

KTO: Model Alignment as Prospect Theoretic Optimization

This work proposes a HALO that directly maximizes the utility of generations instead of maximizing the log-likelihood of preferences, and suggests that the best loss depends on the inductive biases most appropriate for a given setting, an oft-overlooked consideration.

Kawin Ethayarajh, Winnie Xu, Niklas Muennighoff et al. · 195 citations · ⚡28
#machine learning Review Open access Jun 2014

Why Early-Stage Software Startups Fail: A Behavioral Framework

This state-of-practice investigation was performed using a literature review followed by a multiple-case study approach and presents how inconsistency between managerial strategies and execution can lead to failure by means of a behavioral framework.

Carmine Giardino, Xiaofeng Wang, P. Abrahamsson · 175 citations · ⚡19

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 23, 2026

Q&A: How AI came to model the “messy” human mind

Assistant Professor Benjamin Lindquist studies how engineers deliberately injected randomness into early AI, giving rise to deep-learning models that sometimes hallucinate.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.