The types of errors that arise in LLMs'reasoning processes on mathematical datasets are clarified and manually analyze the features of reasoning errors.
Abstract
The reasoning ability of large language models (LLMs) is a critical factor for practical LLM-based applications. To investigate the current reasoning capability of LLMs, we clarify the types of errors that arise in LLMs'reasoning processes on mathematical datasets. We focus on problems where LLMs produce an incorrect answer. We define errors in the reasoning process as reasoning errors and manually analyze the features of reasoning errors. We defined and classified 21 error classes and identified the frequently occurring classes among them. Beyond qualitative evaluation, we leverage the evaluation results to improve the reasoning capability. We designed a prompt that explicitly focuses on eight error classes. The experiments demonstrate that this prompt effectively improves reasoning performance. Furthermore, the results suggest that the frequent reasoning errors identified in this paper are common across LLMs of comparable scale.
Logical reasoning with large language models (LLMs) is a critical capability, as it reflects a system's ability to correctly deduce hypotheses from a given context using faithful deductive processes. However, LLM reasoning has often been shown to be sensitive to small surface-level variations in problem formulation, ra...
Ramya Keerthy Thatikonda, W. Buntine, Ehsan Shareghi· 0 citations
It is argued that emergent reasoning in LLMs is a product of three factors: model size, prompting approach, and evaluation metric, and proposed implications for designing benchmarks and assessing capabilities are proposed.
N. Kuotsu· International Journal of Cre...· 0 citations
This work introduces a framework for automatic annotation of reasoning steps through the lens of Bloom's Taxonomy, which classifies thinking into six cognitive levels, such as Remembering, Applying and Evaluating, and demonstrates that thinking-type information derived from reasoning traces correlates with correctness,...
Maria-Eleni Zoumpoulidi, Georgios Paraskevopoulos, A. Potamianos· 0 citations
Reasoning Jury, a system that replaces the single judge with a jury of LLMs and a moderated consensus mechanism, is introduced to improve the fidelity of judgments for identifying reasoning defects and can be leveraged to understand failure modes of reasoning LLMs on benchmarks, which allows much deeper understanding o...
Congchao Wang, D. Singh, Qiaozi Gao et al.· 0 citations
RuleWeaver is introduced, a benchmark construction framework for evaluating rule-centered scenario reasoning that starts from corpus-derived IF-THEN Meta Rules, progressively augments them into complex rules, and composes these rules into rule-centered scenario QA instances.
Bo-Han Yu, Shi-Yang Li, Pengfei Cao et al.· 0 citations
Related blog posts
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduSep 24, 2026
A new method, called CW-Net, translates the reasoning process of an autonomous vehicle’s AI system into understandable concepts that explain its behavior.
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.