Skip to content
Review

Molecular mechanisms of heavy metal-induced cancer: Insights from animal models and human implications

Jul 2026 · Toxicology and industrial health · Vol 42, pp. 367 - 383 · 0 citations · 61 references
Medicine

TL;DR

Evaluation of the role of gut microbiome interactions in modulating metal bioavailability and carcinogenic potential, limitations of traditional animal models for mixture risk assessment, and emerging technologies, including single-cell sequencing, CRISPR-based functional genomics, and organ-on-chip platforms that may resolve current knowledge gaps are included.

Abstract

Heavy metals and metalloids, including arsenic (As), cadmium (Cd), chromium (Cr), nickel (Ni), lead (Pb), and mercury (Hg), are well-recognised human carcinogens, and the molecular mechanisms underlying their carcinogenicity are incompletely characterised. In this review, we critically discuss and synthesise the available evidence on how heavy metals and metalloids contribute to cancer development by inducing ROS, oxidative stress, DNA damage, mitochondrial dysfunction, endoplasmic reticulum stress, and alterations in apoptotic regulators such as p53, Bax, and Bcl-2. Metal-specific differences in genotoxic versus cytotoxic mechanisms and assessing endogenous protective responses, including metallothionein sequestration, antioxidant pathways, and chelation, are included. An extended analysis of the toxicodynamics of metal mixtures is also made, focusing on a realistic but underexplored exposure scenario. Co-occurring metal combinations, such as As-Cd-Cr-Pb, produce endpoint-specific interaction profiles that pose a greater risk for neurological and genotoxic effects than for renal endpoints and cardiovascular effects, depending on the binary combination. Cd and As co-exposure produces synergistic DNA damage 3–5 times greater than predicted from single-metal effects through concurrent p53 dysfunction and ROS overload. Evaluation of the role of gut microbiome interactions in modulating metal bioavailability and carcinogenic potential, limitations of traditional animal models for mixture risk assessment, and emerging technologies, including single-cell sequencing, CRISPR-based functional genomics, and organ-on-chip platforms that may resolve current knowledge gaps, are included.

View source

Similar papers

Review Open access Aug 2026

Metal carcinogens and cancer: integrating genetic and epigenetic perspectives

This review gives a comprehensive overview of the function of metals in causing cancer, focusing on pathways such as genotoxicity, mutagenesis, epigenetic modification, and cancer-related signaling.

Shipra Singh, Priyanka Phogat, Luciano Saso et al. · 1 citation
Open access Aug 2026

Distinct Interactions of Arsenite and Cadmium with Metal Homeostasis and the Cellular Stress Response in Human Bronchial Epithelial Cells

Although exposure to heavy metals such as cadmium and inorganic arsenic has declined in recent decades, they remain prevalent environmental contaminants in food, drinking water, and tobacco smoke. This study aimed to identify and compare molecular endpoints of arsenite and cadmium toxicity at the gene and protein expre...

Martin Link, Jana Kuhn, M. Parsdorfer et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Heavy Metal–Induced Hepatic Inflammation: Mechanistic Pathways, Epidemiological Evidence, and the Emerging but Unvalidated Role of Plant-Based Dietary Strategies

Current evidence supports the liver as a potentially important target of chronic metal exposure; however, the available human evidence remains largely observational and does not establish causality.

J. B. Adokwe, P. Pouyfung, Noriyoshi Ogino et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

FROM EXPOSURE INDICES TO CELLULAR DAMAGE: A REVIEW ON INTEGRATED FRAMEWORK FOR GENOTOXICITY-INFORMED HEAVY METAL RISK ASSESSMENT

This approach moves beyond a purely statistical exercise and offers a biologically grounded model with real-world implications for the setting and harmonization of international food safety standards, based on bioaccessibility-corrected exposure estimates and in vitro-to-in vivo extrapolation.

Manisha Jain, S. Sachdeva, G. Bharat · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Mitigation of Heavy Metal Effects by Natural Antioxidants and Chelating Agents

Dietary sources, phytochemicals, minerals, and synthetic agents as protective strategies are highlighted, emphasizing the need for further clinical research, public policies, and sustainable practices to prevent heavy metal exposure and its associated health risks.

Vanesa Ramírez-Bello, Natalia Bonilla-Lizarazo, N. E. Arenas et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Heavy metal induced cellular proteostasis failure promotes neurodegeneration and therapeutic opportunities

Exposure to heavy metals is a significant environmental risk factor for neurodegenerative diseases. Persistent exposure to heavy metals including lead, mercury, cadmium, manganese, copper, and arsenic are all examples of non-biodegradable, bioaccumulative toxicants that can cross the blood–brain barrier (BBB) and disru...

S. Tyagi, Anubhav Tyagi, Kajal Choudhary et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.