Skip to content
Conference

Supervised and Unsupervised approach of Machine Learning: A Comparative Study for Credit Card Fraud Detection Across Diverse Datasets

Jul 2026 · 2026 7th International Conference on Smart Systems and Inventive Technology (ICSSIT) · pp. 1949-1956 · 0 citations · 20 references

Abstract

Credit card fraud detection is a challenging task due to the increase in digital transactions, evolving fraud patterns, and severe class imbalance present in real-world datasets. Although several comparative studies have been done in this domain, many of them are limited to a single dataset and primarily focus on predictive performance. This study presents a comparative evaluation of Supervised and Unsupervised Machine Learning algorithms for credit card fraud detection across five diverse Kaggle datasets with varied sizes, class distributions, and feature representations, including PCA-transformed numerical datasets and real-world-like datasets having numerical and categorical features. Eleven Supervised Machine Learning algorithms, namely Logistic Regression, Support Vector Machine, Decision Tree, Random Forest, Gradient Boosting, Naïve Bayes, K-Nearest Neighbors, LightGBM, XGBoost, CatBoost, and AdaBoost, together with four Unsupervised Machine Learning algorithms, namely K-Means, DBSCAN, Isolation Forest, and One-Class SVM, were evaluated using a consistent experimental framework. To keep alignment with real-world transaction environments, no sampling, resampling, or class-balancing techniques were applied. Performance was assessed using Accuracy, Precision, Recall, F1-score, ROC AUC, PR AUC, MCC, learning time, and execution time. Experimental results show that supervised ensemble methods consistently outperformed unsupervised approaches across all datasets. XGBoost and CatBoost achieved consistently strong fraud detection performance in terms of ROC AUC, PR AUC, and MCC across diverse datasets while keeping reasonable computational efficiency. Their ability to achieve high fraud detection performance under severe class imbalance makes them suitable for practical fraud detection systems. The findings provide practical insights into the robustness, scalability, and suitability of machine learning algorithms for credit card fraud detection under varying real-world data conditions that helps researchers and scientist for its better understandings.

View source

Similar papers

Open access Aug 2026

An Enhancing Credit Card Fraud Detection through Data Preprocessing and SMOTE-Based Class Balancing: A Comparative Evaluation of Machine Learning Models

This study compares the performance of several supervised machine learning models for fraud detection, using a unified data preprocessing pipeline, and found that ensemble learning methods generally outperform single classifiers in both accuracy and minority-class recognition.

Nafiu Yahuza, Ahmad Baita Garko, Abubakar Atiku Muslim et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Neural Network-based Model for Detecting Credit Card Fraud: A Comparative Study of Oversampling Techniques and Feature Selection

Results support ADASYN + XGBoost as the best-performing configuration among the four models evaluated in this study and support ADASYN + XGBoost as the best-performing configuration among the four models evaluated in this study.

Kalala Kanyinda Norbert, Mukala Patrick, Kafunda Katalayi Pierre · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

CREDIT CARD FRAUD DETECTION USING ENSEMBLE MACHINE LEARNING METHODS

The study results show that ensemble techniques enhance the detection of fraudulent credit card transactions significantly and the proposed framework included data preprocessing and imbalanced data handling using SMOTE produced good results in terms of classification performance and reliable detections.

Moohanad Jawthari, Ihsan Sahib, N. H. Fadhil · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Credit Card Fraud Detection under Extreme Class Imbalance: A Comparison of KNN and Logistic Regression

The main finding is that under severe imbalance ROC-AUC can be misleading and PR-AUC is more informative; KNN baseline is a balanced detector without tuning, threshold-tuned LR baseline gives the best single operating point, and LR+SMOTE suits cases where recall is the priority.

Felicia Sword, Christopher Andreas · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

An Ensemble Machine Learning Approach for Financial Fraud Detection in Banking Systems

Empirical evidence is provided that for fraud detection with well-engineered features in low-dimensional spaces, ensemble methods yield optimal results and the undersampling strategy proves effective for handling class imbalance while maintaining computational efficiency.

Richard Chafukira Phiri · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.