A systematic, PRISMA-guided review of 50 publications released between 2020 and 2026, identified through searches of IEEE Xplore, ACM Digital Library, SpringerLink, arXiv, Google Scholar, and DBLP, on face recognition frameworks that use federated learning.
Abstract
Federated learning is a popular decentralized machine learning paradigm that enables multiple devices or entities to collectively train a common model without sending data to a central server. The distributed data availability improves privacy and security for each participating entity by keeping their data localized. Face recognition, a rapidly evolving field, uses deep learning techniques to achieve remarkable advances, frequently outperforming human performance on specific public datasets. However, the sensitive nature of facial data, as faces belong to personally identifiable information, raises serious privacy and security concerns on training data sharing. Federated learning has emerged as a promising solution to the privacy and security issues confronting the face recognition community. This paper provides a systematic, PRISMA-guided review of 50 publications released between 2020 and 2026, identified through searches of IEEE Xplore, ACM Digital Library, SpringerLink, arXiv, Google Scholar, and DBLP, on face recognition frameworks that use federated learning. The reviewed techniques are systematically classified into six categories, with an emphasis on their contributions and relevance to the larger domain of federated learning based face recognition. This work aims to summarize and analyze various federated facial recognition methods, including their underlying techniques, results, and goals. This survey also compares against twelve existing face recognition surveys to clarify its distinct and unique contributions. Furthermore, it provides a high-level detailed overview of how various federated learning functionalities and design principles have been used in face recognition applications. This review identifies key challenges while highlighting promising research directions for future advancements in the field.
The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.
Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al.· Information and Software Tec...· 394 citations· ⚡54
This state-of-practice investigation was performed using a literature review followed by a multiple-case study approach and presents how inconsistency between managerial strategies and execution can lead to failure by means of a behavioral framework.
Carmine Giardino, Xiaofeng Wang, P. Abrahamsson· International Conference on...· 175 citations· ⚡19
This study conducts a case survey study based on the secondary data of the major pivots happened in 49 software startups, and demonstrates that customer need pivot is the most common among all pivot types.
Sohaib Shahid Bajwa, Xiaofeng Wang, Anh Nguyen-Duc et al.· Empirical Software Engineeri...· 127 citations· ⚡15
It is found that roles of MVPs in startups were not fully aware by entrepreneurs, and entrepreneurs should consider a systematic approach to fully explore the value of MVP, as a multiple facet product (MFP).
Anh Nguyen-Duc, P. Abrahamsson· International Conference on...· 93 citations· ⚡9
It is found that what perceived as biggest challenges by software startups do vary across different life cycle stages, even though its significance decreases when the learning focuses of the startups move from problem to solution and their products mature.
Xiaofeng Wang, Henry Edison, Sohaib Shahid Bajwa et al.· International Conference on...· 62 citations· ⚡6
A comprehensive overview of how enhanced sampling methods are reshaping the field, with a particular focus on the data-driven construction of collective variables, is provided.
Kai Zhu, Enrico Trizio, Jintu Zhang et al.· Chemical Reviews· 58 citations
Related blog posts
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 23, 2026
Assistant Professor Benjamin Lindquist studies how engineers deliberately injected randomness into early AI, giving rise to deep-learning models that sometimes hallucinate.