Skip to content

Integrating genetic predictors into subsequent breast cancer risk prediction in survivors of childhood cancer.

Sep 2026 · Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 0 citations
Medicine

TL;DR

Externally-validated primary breast cancer genetic susceptibility predictors are relevant for SBC risk prediction and should be prioritized for risk stratification in survivors.

Abstract

Purpose

Female survivors of childhood cancer are at high risk for developing breast cancer. The contributions of most general population primary breast cancer genetic predictors to this risk have not been explored.

Methods

Analyses included females who survived ≥5 years after their childhood cancer diagnosis with available array (N = 2096, subsequent breast cancer [SBC]=218) or whole-genome sequencing (WGS; N = 3292, SBC=101) data from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study and St. Jude Lifetime Cohort. We computed 99 externally-validated primary breast cancer polygenic risk scores (PRS). Using deep-coverage WGS, ClinVar-annotated pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants in breast cancer susceptibility genes were identified. Cox proportional hazards models assessed associations with SBC risk, adjusting for treatments and genetic ancestry.

Results

Among 5388 female survivors (genetic ancestry, European: N = 4,752; African: N = 444; East Asian: N = 192), 319 developed SBC. Most (90.9%) PRSs were nominally associated with SBC risk (P < 0.05), but effect sizes varied substantially. PRSs with superior discriminatory ability had greater genome-wide coverage (e.g., 6.4 million-variant PRS, HR per SD = 1.71, 95% CI = 1.43 to 2.05; P = 4.2x10-9) and 7.7-fold higher odds (P = 7.0x10-4) of including variants in multiple DNA damage repair pathways compared with PRSs with weaker risk associations. Among survivors with WGS, 1.6% carried P/LP variants in clinical testing panel genes, which was associated with a 7.4-fold greater risk (95% CI = 3.16 to 17.19). Including genetic factors improved SBC risk prediction by age 40 (P < 0.001) compared to treatment exposures alone.

Conclusions

Externally-validated primary breast cancer genetic susceptibility predictors are relevant for SBC risk prediction and should be prioritized for risk stratification in survivors.

View source

Similar papers

Open access Sep 2026

Genetic risk stratification of common diseases in breast cancer survivors: a population-based cohort study.

IMPORTANCE Patients diagnosed with breast cancer (BCa) are at increased risk of multiple common diseases; however, the spectrum of these diseases and the contribution of inherited genetic susceptibility remain incompletely characterized. METHODS We evaluated 15 common diseases and tested their associations with BCa e...

Annabelle Ashworth, Zhu-Qing Shi, Huy Tran et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Development and Validation of a Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Breast Cancer–Specific Survival in Young Women with Early-Stage Breast Cancer: A SEER-Based Study

Background & Objective: Breast cancer in women aged ≤40 years is biologically aggressive and carries a disproportionate cancer-specific mortality risk. Existing prognostic tools predominantly predict overall survival, rarely account for competing risks of non-cancer death, and have not evaluated whether primary treatme...

Umema Tariq, Yousaf Ali, Mohammad Idrees et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Risk of Developing Subsequent Primary Colorectal Cancers Among Non-Colorectal Cancer Survivors: Implications for Prevention and Screening.

The risk of CRC varied across first primary cancer sites but remained elevated among both short- and long-term survivors, demonstrating the importance of improving adherence to CRC screening guidelines among cancer survivors.

Dylan E. O'Sullivan, R. Hilsden, Hannah Harsanyi et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Performance of general-population breast cancer risk prediction models in an international consortium

Background: Several breast cancer (BC) risk prediction models have been developed to provide personal risk assessments. Though individually validated, their performance has not been systematically evaluated across a wide range of populations or ages. Methods: We harmonized individual-level baseline questionnaire data a...

K. Brantley, T. Ahearn, E. Norton et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Sep 2026

Risk prediction models for breast cancer integrating family history of breast cancer and prophylactic interventions

Breast cancer risk assessment and prediction models are very important tools for the clinical management of healthy women carrying pathogenic variants in known cancer genes. We propose in this paper a comprehensive prediction model for the personalized clinical management of women with pathogenic variants in {\it BRCA1...

Siriac Seboka, Laurent Briollais, Yun-Hee Choi et al. · 0 citations
Aug 2026

Risk of breast cancer after ovarian cancer in germline BRCA1/2 heterozygotes.

Breast cancer risk after ovarian cancer in germline BRCA1/2 heterozygotes remains uncertain, with a recent large multicentre international study reporting lower-than-expected incidence in the first decade after ovarian cancer diagnosis (Apostol et al. 2026). We re‑evaluated our previously published regional cohort of 7...

Robert D. Morgan, E. Woodward, D. G. Evans · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.