Jul 2026· Genetics in Medicine· pp. 102665 - 102665· 0 citations
Medicine
TL;DR
Fam3PRO provides a validated approach for familial risk stratification across a broad spectrum of cancer types, including estimates of carrier probabilities and future cancer risk, and is validated on three independent multi-ethnic panel cohorts.
Abstract
Purpose: Quantitative assessment of the risk of inherited cancer susceptibility should reflect the growing number of well-documented gene-cancer associations beyond single syndromes, to increase efficiency when identifying candidates for genetic testing and early detection. Methods: We validate Fam3PRO, a computationally efficient Mendelian risk prediction methodology and platform that supports constructing models with an arbitrary number of genes and cancers, on three independent multi-ethnic panel cohorts. Fam3PRO was trained using population-level parameters from existing literature for 21 genes and 17 cancers. Results: Fam3PRO provides discrimination and calibration comparable to the widely-adopted syndrome-specific models BRCAPRO and MMRpro, for genes associated with Breast-Ovarian and Lynch syndromes. Furthermore, when assessing the probability of being heterozygous for at least one pathogenic variant in any of the 21 genes, Fam3PRO has a discrimination of 0.64 (95% C.I. 0.62–0.67) and a calibration (observed divided by expected) of 1.13 (95% C.I. 1.05–1.22) in the combined cohort. At probability thresholds of 2.5% and 5%, Fam3PRO identifies more individuals at high risk of being heterozygous for pathogenic variants in any of the 21 genes than BRCAPRO and MMRpro. Conclusion: Fam3PRO provides a validated approach for familial risk stratification across a broad spectrum of cancer types, including estimates of carrier probabilities and future cancer risk.
BCa and inherited genetic susceptibility jointly contribute to increased risk of multiple common diseases, supporting the integration of genetic risk stratification into survivorship care.
Annabelle Ashworth, Zhu-Qing Shi, Huy Tran et al.· JNCI Cancer Spectrum· 0 citations
This review summarizes the principles of PRS, the main sources of variability between models, and its potential applications in risk stratification and personalized cancer screening and addresses limitations in transferability, the need for calibration, and the currently limited evidence for improvements in hard clinic...
Adéla Mišove, E. Macháčková, Klára Nováková et al.· Klinicka onkologie· 0 citations
A multi-population meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies, including 32,470 individuals with and 1,753,462 without bladder cancer, identifies 70 independent risk loci, of which 43 are novel, and uses experimental approaches to uncover how inherited variation influences this risk in the context of smoking.
L. Prokunina-Olsson, O. Flórez-Vargas, Michael G. Levin et al.· Nature Communications· 0 citations
Assessment of the role of germline CHEK2 variants in the development of different cancer types confirmed that CHEK2 c.470T>C is the most common variant in the patient group, and the contribution of this variant to hereditary cancer risk in the Russian population is modest.
M. Nemtsova, M. Makarova, Anastasiia M. Danishevich et al.· International Journal of Mol...· 0 citations
Rare variants in MSH6 and BRCA2 are significantly associated with increased HCC risk, revealing a previously unconfirmed role for DNA repair genes in HCC susceptibility across ancestrally diverse populations and may inform genetic risk stratification and surveillance strategies.
A. Garófalo, Perapa Chotiprasidhi, Josephine P. Johnson et al.· JHEP Reports· 0 citations
A comprehensive genetic prediction of CRC risk provides insights that could streamline screening and prevention guidelines and was strongly associated with early onset CRC risk.
A. Parasuraman, A. Lim, R. Eltayib et al.· medRxiv· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.