Oct 2026· Bone· Vol 211, pp.
117944
· 0 citations· 37 references
Medicine
TL;DR
DXA ordering during U.S. primary care visits appears markedly low among men at risk for osteoporosis, representing a missed opportunity for early detection and fracture prevention.
Abstract
Background
Clinical practice guidelines from the Endocrine Society recommend osteoporosis screening in high-risk men; however, the extent of implementation in clinical practice is unclear.
Methods
We conducted a cross-sectional study using data from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) from 2012 to 2019. We evaluated ordering patterns for dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) during primary care visits among patients eligible for screening under the Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline, based on guideline-concordant criteria operationalized using available NAMCS variables. We included men aged≥70 years and women aged≥65 years. Also, men aged 50-69 years and women aged 50-64 years with additional risk factors, such as body mass index<18.5 kg/m2, tobacco use, alcohol use disorder, or glucocorticoid therapy. We excluded visits among patients with osteoporosis. The trend in DXA screening was examined using multivariable, survey-weighted log-binomial regression models, and results are presented as relative risks (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) and two-sided p-values.
Results
We identified 4573 visits for eligible individuals. The median age was 72 years; 61% were women, 74% were non-Hispanic White, and 11% were non-Hispanic Black. The likelihood of DXA ordering was approximately 100 times less likely at visits among men suggested for screening (0.04%; 95% CI 0.00%-0.15%) than among women suggested for screening (5.1%; 95% CI 3.5%-7.1%). We observed no significant change in DXA ordering across survey years (p = 0.48). DXA ordering among women peaked at 6.9% in 2014-2016, while rates among men remained below 0.1%.
Conclusion
DXA ordering during U.S. primary care visits appears markedly low among men at risk for osteoporosis, representing a missed opportunity for early detection and fracture prevention.
Screening based on FRAX and a history of previous fractures is an effective strategy for reducing fracture rates in real-world clinical practice and may therefore be recommended for widespread use in primary healthcare.
E. Gladkova, V. Tanaev, D. A. Shimanski et al.· Modern Rheumatology Journal· 0 citations
Osteoporosis is a major health problem linked to population aging. Internal medicine outpatients often have multiple comorbidities and a high osteoporosis risk; however, osteoporosis prevalence and treatment rates remain unclear. We investigated osteoporosis prevalence and treatment rates in a large cohort of int...
Ryuji Okuno, Yasuhiro Homma, Kei Matsuno et al.· Aging Clinical and Experimen...· 0 citations
Densitometric osteoporosis was identified in a relevant proportion of women younger than 65 years without traditional risk factors, supporting an individualized approach to bone health assessment.
Josefina Rosmino, M. Pavlove, M. L. Brance et al.· EndoAr· 0 citations
Perceived as a disease of postmenopausal women, osteoporosis is an underrecognised problem in males, as well. In India, available evidence on osteoporosis prevalence in healthy men is limited and heterogeneous, and many studies rely on non–gold-standard assessment tools. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim...
M. Raj, Saurabh Suman, Sudarsan Behera et al.· The Indian journal of medica...· 0 citations