The pooled analysis supports an association between dietary inflammatory potential and oral cancer risk and suggests that dietary interventions aimed at reducing inflammation may be a viable strategy for oral cancer prevention.
Abstract
Background Chronic inflammation is a recognized hallmark of cancer. The association between the inflammatory potential of diet and the risk of oral cancer remains unclear. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to quantify this association. Methods A comprehensive search of PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science was performed to identify observational studies investigating the relationship between dietary inflammatory potential scores and oral cancer risk. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random-effects model. Results Seven observational studies met the inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis revealed that individuals in the highest category of dietary inflammatory potential had a significantly higher risk of oral cancer compared to those in the lowest category (Pooled OR = 1.92, 95% CI: 1.41–2.62). The continuous analysis indicated that each 1-unit increment in the dietary inflammatory potential score was associated with a 19% increase in oral cancer risk. Sensitivity analysis using the leave-one-out approach confirmed the robustness of the pooled estimates. Conclusion Our pooled analysis supports an association between dietary inflammatory potential and oral cancer risk. These findings suggest that dietary interventions aimed at reducing inflammation may be a viable strategy for oral cancer prevention.
Current longitudinal evidence suggests that MetS is associated with a modest but significant increase in the risk of incident OC, and findings for individual MetS components are exploratory and hypothesis-generating.
Li-Jun Liao, Juan Nie, Ru Jia· Frontiers in Oncology· 0 citations
An inverse association between higher adherence to the MedDiet and pancreatic cancer risk is suggested, however, the observational nature of the available evidence limits causal inference.
Yu-Xin Zhang, Min Du, Lu Li et al.· Frontiers in Nutrition· 0 citations
Serum 25(OH)D and dietary intake showed no significant pooled associations, whereas VDR FokI was associated with increased gastric cancer susceptibility, whereas the absence of paediatric evidence highlights an important knowledge gap.
Roxana Pântea, L. Meliț· Medical Science· 0 citations
BACKGROUND
Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is associated with an increased risk of bladder cancer, but the impact of specific antidiabetic drug classes remains uncertain.
METHODS
We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis following PRISMA guidelines. PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus and CENTRAL were searched th...
W. Mathez, A. Vincentelli, I. Chaoui et al.· Urologiâ· 0 citations
Objective: Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women worldwide. Studies on the link between dietary inflammation and breast cancer risk have shown inconsistent results. This study aimed to evaluate the relationships between the Dietary Inflammatory Index (DII), the Dietary Phytochemical Index (DPI), and breast c...
Murat Urhan, R. Meseri, Sema Nur Güven et al.· İzmir Kâtip Çelebi üniversit...· 0 citations
Alcohol consumption is a known risk factor for various cancers, but the dose-response relationship between alcohol intake and pancreatic cancer risk remains unclear. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the dose-response relationship between them. A search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase for prospec...
Jia-Le Li, Ling Liu, Ji-Feng Sun et al.· Nutrition and Cancer· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.