Jan 2026· The Breast Journal· Vol 2026· 0 citations· 18 references
Medicine
TL;DR
The effectiveness of conventional two‐dimensional mammography is strongly dependent on breast density, with reduced sensitivity and increased interval cancer rates for clients with extremely dense breasts, providing evidence to support future evaluation of more individualised screening approaches.
Abstract
Background Breast density is both an independent risk factor for breast cancer and a major determinant of mammographic diagnostic performance. However, its impact on overall screening performance within population‐based screening programs is less well understood. Methods This retrospective cohort study included women aged 50–74 years screened through BreastScreen NSW between 1 January 2016 and 31 December 2017, excluding first‐time screeners above 70. Breast density was assessed using Lunit INSIGHT MMG (v1.1.7) generating an ordinal density score (1–10) and corresponding BI‐RADS category (A–D). Screen‐detected and interval cancers were ascertained via the NSW BreastScreen Information System and the NSW Cancer Registry. Standard screening performance metrics were calculated stratified by age, breast density and screening round. Results The cohort comprised 564,681 screening episodes, with 4758 cancers diagnosed (3756 screen‐detected; 1002 interval). Cancer incidence rates and screening performance varied by breast density. The proportion of cancers that were interval cancers increased markedly with increasing density, from 10.9% of cancers in category A (least dense) to 46.6% in category D. Recall rates followed an N‐shaped pattern, peaking in density category C, while specificity mirrored this relationship. Conclusion The effectiveness of conventional two‐dimensional mammography is strongly dependent on breast density, with reduced sensitivity and increased interval cancer rates for clients with extremely dense breasts. By utilising a more granular measure of breast density in a large population screening cohort, this study identified nonlinear relationships between breast density and screening performance metrics, providing evidence to support future evaluation of more individualised screening approaches.
Higher breast density was associated with later age at menarche, nulliparity, breastfeeding, history of benign breast disease, alcohol consumption, lower body mass index (BMI) at recruitment and at age 20, and current use of menopausal hormone therapy (MHT).
L. Johns, Martina Brayley, R. Frost et al.· Breast Cancer Research· 0 citations
BACKGROUND
Optimizing surveillance for the growing population of breast cancer survivors remains a challenge. Although screening guidelines for initial breast cancer are well established, current surveillance guidelines recommending routine provider examinations rely heavily on expert consensus rather than real-world d...
A. Duffens, Cecile A. Laurent, I. Ergas et al.· The Journal of the National...· 0 citations
Objectives: Women with a history of breast cancer are at increased risk of developing subsequent breast cancer, including ipsilateral recurrence and contralateral new primary breast cancer. This study evaluated the discriminatory performance of a mammogram-based artificial intelligence (AI) risk model for predicting su...
S. Ogunlade, A. Dakkak, Amie Leon et al.· Journal of Clinical Medicine· 0 citations
OBJECTIVE
Breast cancer method of detection (MOD) describes how a cancer is first identified: through screening or non-screening (symptomatic/incidental) presentation. We examined associations between MOD and patient demographics, tumor characteristics, treatment patterns, and survival.
METHODS
This retrospective coh...
Babita Panigrahi, Alexandra DiTommaso, N. Ghuman et al.· Journal of the American Coll...· 0 citations
OBJECTIVES
The sensitivity of mammographic screening is lower for women with mammographically dense vs fatty breasts. We aimed to explore automated mammographic breast density and malignancy risk scores generated by an artificial intelligence (AI) model for breast cancer detection, stratified by mammography vendor.
M...
M. Larsen, N. Moshina, Karl Øyvind Mikalsen et al.· European Radiology· 1 citation
No single modality is universally optimal for breast cancer detection, and a risk-stratified, personalised screening approach is recommended, with DBT as preferred standard for average-risk populations and MRI for high-risk individuals.
Tania Amko, Tongbram Bidyananda Singh, Keleriano et al.· International journal of med...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.