OODA-Tool, a typed closed-loop policy designed to mitigate state preservation from action realization, consistently improves task success across model sizes, with larger gains on smaller models and on tasks whose actions depend strongly on information accumulated across turns and prior tool results.
Abstract
Reliable multi-turn tool use requires an agent to preserve an evolving task state and ensure that each action remains consistent with it. However, direct function-calling and ReAct-style policies learn state tracking and action generation within the same autoregressive trajectory. This coupling creates state-action competition: the pressure to produce the next call can overwrite or ignore information accumulated earlier in the interaction. Inspired by Boyd's Observe-Orient-Decide-Act cycle, we introduce OODA-Tool, a typed closed-loop policy designed to mitigate this competition by separating state preservation from action realization. Rather than generating an action directly from the interaction history, OODA-Tool routes each decision through controller-checked intermediate states, ensuring that the final output remains grounded in the current task state. Specifically, Observe reconstructs the task state, Orient determines whether execution is warranted, Decide forms an admissible action structure, and Act realizes the external output. We evaluate OODA-Tool against direct function-calling and ReAct policies using Qwen3 models ranging from 0.6B to 14B across multi-turn, multi-tool, and incomplete-information settings. OODA-Tool consistently improves task success across model sizes, with larger gains on smaller models and on tasks whose actions depend strongly on information accumulated across turns and prior tool results. Controlled variants, stage-level ablations, and transfer evaluations further demonstrate the robustness of these improvements.
Tool-calling agents infer task state from accumulated dialogue and tool traces. In persistent interactions, however, historical traces may remain structurally valid and semantically plausible after they cease to be authoritative for the current request. We show that such history can hijack a policy the model already possesses: on Qwen3-1.7B, pollution flips 32.1% of decisions that are correct under the original trajectory and frequently induces reuse of corrupted entities or interface conventions. We introduce bench, a paired benchmark with synchronized Original, Polluted, and Oracle State views that preserve the system policy, current tools, latest request, and gold next action. Eleven gold-preserving interventions isolate failures in decision state, entity binding, and interface execution across complete calls and non-call decisions. We further propose ours, which transfers an Oracle-conditioned teacher policy to a student observing only polluted history through soft supervision on student-generated prefixes. On Qwen3-1.7B, ours achieves 87.0% Balanced Tool-Use Accuracy, outperforming Gold-SFT (66.3%), Oracle sequence distillation (82.3%), and off-policy token distillation (85.0%). The method scales consistently: an 8B teacher raises the same compact 1.7B student to 91.9%, while an 8B student reaches 93.0%. The resulting policies further transfer to clean histories, unseen functions, independently regenerated evaluation contexts, external tool-use benchmarks, and noisy multi-hop question answering. These results establish history reliability as a distinct tool-use bottleneck and demonstrate reliable-state policy transfer as an effective and scalable solution.
Xiaoqin Wu, Xingyu Fan, Feifei Li et al.· 0 citations
This paper studies a compact harness design by following a single request through context formation, model decision, environmental action, observation return, and state continuation, showing the harness's core role: turning model generations into environmental actions, carrying runtime feedback into later decisions, and allowing state to continue across requests.
Robot manipulation requires policies that are both accurate and efficient, as robot control must respond to changing observations under tight latency constraints. Recent diffusion and flow policies are promising, but they often treat conditions as auxiliary signals rather than jointly evolving them with action trajectories. We find that this limitation can be effectively mitigated by a \textbf{simple yet effective unified condition-action modeling design} that represents conditions and actions in a shared token space, allowing a compact model to achieve high performance while improving both inference speed and accuracy. Therefore, we propose UCA-Flow, a unified condition-action modeling framework for accurate one-step action generation. Our method unifies observation conditions, timestep conditions, interval conditions, and action tokens into a single sequence, and processes them with a Unified Condition-Action Transformer for joint condition-action representation learning. As a result, condition representations are dynamically reconstructed according to the current generation stage, highlighting information most relevant for action refinement. Furthermore, we introduce an improved dual-pass supervision scheme over $u$ and $v$ for stronger optimization of unified condition-action modeling. UCA-Flow improves the average success rate by 9.3 percentage points over the strongest baseline, while achieving $45.6\times$ and $33.4\times$ speedups over DP3 and Simple DP3, and remaining $4.3\times$ and $2.3\times$ faster than one-step FlowPolicy and MP1, respectively.Project page: https://uca-policy.github.io/UCA.github.io/.
Xinyu Zhou, Zikun Cai, Kuangji Zuo et al.· 0 citations
Results demonstrate that model-external structured state maintenance and closed-loop agentic decision making can effectively extend the local control capabilities of WAMs into embodied task execution that is plannable, verifiable, and recoverable.
Zhaopeng Gu, Bingke Zhu, Tianxin Lin et al.· 0 citations
User-centric multi-turn agents must act on an evolving task situation shaped by changing user intents, accumulated tool-grounded facts, missing information, and execution constraints. Existing context-management methods improve the use of past interaction history, but rarely maintain an explicit situation state that separates grounded facts from task-state judgments. As a result, agents often need to infer fine-grained attributes, task dependencies, and constraint satisfaction implicitly from dialogue traces. We propose Intent-Driven Situation States (IDSS), a training-free framework that maintains an explicit situation state alongside the dialogue. IDSS parses tool returns into provenance-aware entities and attributes, tracks user intents, required variables, constraints, and execution status, and propagates new facts to task constraints to update action executability. This allows agents to avoid infeasible actions, advance dependent goals, and reuse relevant information without repeatedly searching raw history. Experiments on three interactive benchmarks across eight LLMs show that IDSS improves task completion, preference elicitation, and interaction efficiency, with clear gains on tasks involving multi-entity coordination, evolving user constraints, and constraint-aware replanning. Ablations and error analyses show that these improvements come from the interaction between fact persistence, intent-centered state tracking, and constraint modeling. These results suggest that explicit situation tracking offers an effective alternative to history-centric context management for reliable user-centric multi-turn agents.
LocalLSTC is introduced, a training-free architecture that organizes control by temporal scope, maintaining persistent cross-step state to guide short-term execution commitments, and identifies temporal organization of control information as a distinct architectural dimension for locally deployed GUI agents.
