A computer-assisted framework that establishes global regularity for continuous families of three-dimensional periodic Navier-Stokes flows and matched neural-operator experiments show that physics-informed training improves physical prediction, while also revealing that these gains do not necessarily improve the discovery of proof-limiting initial conditions.
Abstract
Numerical simulations reveal how vortices stretch and transfer energy, but establishing smooth evolution requires bounds that remain valid beyond the simulated resolution. Here I develop a computer-assisted framework that establishes global regularity for continuous families of three-dimensional periodic Navier-Stokes flows. Its central construction combines finite reference trajectories with a common error bound that covers an interval of centre fields and infinitely many smooth perturbation modes. The method retains the complete nonlinear residual before spectral truncation and controls the evolution until viscous decay guarantees regularity for all subsequent times. Applications to cyclic-shear, Arnold-Beltrami-Childress and three-component Taylor-Green fields yield explicit perturbation radii and include initial conditions outside the direct Fourier-Wiener smallness criterion. A parameter-uniform extension covers a connected family of non-Beltrami Taylor-Green centres without repeating the proof for individual parameter values. An ensemble of 4,096 configurations, supplemented by 1,600 refinement trajectories and public turbulence data, connects the mathematical observables to spectral transfer and vortex geometry. Matched neural-operator experiments show that physics-informed training improves physical prediction, while also revealing that these gains do not necessarily improve the discovery of proof-limiting initial conditions. Together, these results provide a reusable method for establishing regularity across prescribed flow families and a quantitative setting for evaluating how learned predictions can assist rigorous computation.
The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.
Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al.· Information and Software Tec...· 394 citations· ⚡54
The possibility of inferring high-dimensional data inference in a model that consists of a prior and an auxiliary differentiable constraint given some additional information is considered, thereby allowing a range of potential applications in adapting models to new domains and tasks.
Alexandros Graikos, Esmeralda S. Whitammer, N. Jojic et al.· Neural Information Processin...· 316 citations· ⚡15
It is proved that any global minimizer of the trajectory balance objective can define a policy that samples exactly from the target distribution, and empirically demonstrate the benefits of the trajectories balance objective for GFlowNet convergence, diversity of generated samples, and robustness to long action sequenc...
Esmeralda S. Whitammer, Moksh Jain, Emmanuel Bengio et al.· Neural Information Processin...· 302 citations· ⚡60
An algorithm is proposed which leverages disentangled semantic factors to generate adversarial perturbation by altering controlled semantic attributes to fool the learner towards various "adversarial" targets.
Haonan Qiu, Chaowei Xiao, Lei Yang et al.· arXiv.org· 208 citations· ⚡17
This work proposes a HALO that directly maximizes the utility of generations instead of maximizing the log-likelihood of preferences, and suggests that the best loss depends on the inductive biases most appropriate for a given setting, an oft-overlooked consideration.
This state-of-practice investigation was performed using a literature review followed by a multiple-case study approach and presents how inconsistency between managerial strategies and execution can lead to failure by means of a behavioral framework.
Carmine Giardino, Xiaofeng Wang, P. Abrahamsson· International Conference on...· 175 citations· ⚡19
Related blog posts
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 23, 2026
Assistant Professor Benjamin Lindquist studies how engineers deliberately injected randomness into early AI, giving rise to deep-learning models that sometimes hallucinate.