An equity-first, risk-calibrated policy playbook for higher education leaders is offered by integrating equity-centered leadership perspectives with the National Institute of Standards and Technology Artificial Intelligence Risk Management Framework.
Abstract
Across U.S. higher education, adoption of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) is expanding faster than many campus governance systems can guide, monitor, or audit. This paper offers an equity-first, risk-calibrated policy playbook for higher education leaders by integrating equity-centered leadership perspectives with the National Institute of Standards and Technology Artificial Intelligence Risk Management Framework. It specifies governance mechanisms, including risk-tiered use-case portfolios, clear decision rights, procurement and vendor-assurance standards, and auditable documentation such as impact assessments. These mechanisms are anchored in U.S. accountability concerns, including privacy, accessibility, nondiscrimination, and due process. Drawing on a policy-design analysis of federal guidance, institutional policy syntheses, and illustrative state/system levers, the paper identifies recurring governance failure modes, including shadow AI use and decision-support tools that become determinative in practice. It specifies proportionate controls campuses can implement without building a parallel bureaucracy. It concludes with a concise measurement approach for internal improvement and public-facing accountability.
The findings suggest that academic integrity in the GenAI era is shifting from a primarily punitive model toward a pedagogy-first ecosystem that combines clear expectations, assessment redesign, equitable access to vetted tools, and iterative governance.
Yu-Feng Qian· International Journal for Ed...· 0 citations
The findings support risk-calibrated pre-deployment oversight while highlighting comparatively less consistent public disclosure of lifecycle monitoring after deployment.
Umme Aimen Khan· Journal of Economics, Financ...· 0 citations
This paper investigates human-centred XAI resolutions for financial inclusiveness, digital enablers and responsibility and confidence in AI-enabled finance in emerging markets. It examines how AI aids financial audit across credit, fraud, regulation, audit, compliance, digital payment services and risk classification;...
Ganesh P, Dr Avinash Kumar Namdeo· Journal of Advances in Scien...· 0 citations
U.S. public health financing systems, particularly Medicare and Medicaid, continue to face substantial improper-payment and fraud risks. Analytics and machine learning offer expanded detection coverage, more focused investigative targeting, and opportunities for earlier intervention. Evidence from technical studies and...
E. Afriyie, G. Apaflo, Yeboah Mary Magdalene· Asian Journal of Economics B...· 0 citations
Summary Hybrid and microschools have expanded rapidly in the United States. These models do not fit neatly within existing governance categories, raising questions about how authority, accountability, and decision-making are organised in American education. This paper applies Ostrom’s Institutional Analysis and Develop...
Eric Wearne· Journal of Institutional Eco...· 0 citations
Generative AI (GenAI) assessment policies in higher education have centred on originality, disclosure, and permission to use AI. Agentic AI, which can plan, use tools, access platforms, and act with limited human intervention, challenges this logic because it can take over the whole action chain of an assessed task rat...
Kai-Yan Wong, Bo-Jian Sun· Uniglobal Journal of Social...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.