Jul 2026· A Bi-annual South Asian Journal of Research & Innovation· Vol 13, pp. 57-70· 0 citations· 25 references
TL;DR
The paper reviews the situation and develops a framework that draws on governance theory, public administration and digital governance to explain how technology, institutions and values interact to shape policy that can help guide policymakers and scholars in countries in the Global South that are rapidly digitizing but have weak institutions.
Abstract
This article discusses the use of artificial intelligence in the public policy and challenges associated with it such as the velocity of change and the impact on democracy. Artificial intelligence is really changing how we do policy. That is creating a tension between the speed at which we can do things and the democratic way of doing things with AI.” States really like intelligence. But scholars who study this do not all agree. There is not one idea here that links the use of algorithms to how things are already done and the checks we have in place. The paper reviews the situation and develops a framework that draws on governance theory, public administration and digital governance to explain how technology, institutions and values interact to shape policy. The framework consists of three components: strong institutions, transparency of algorithms and democratic accountability. Will this interaction between these things allow artificial intelligence to improve policy without losing legitimacy or make problems like bias, secrecy and lack of accountability worse? Other models separate technology and politics; the article provides a lens, which it calls the Policy-Algorithm Governance Matrix, for seeing how different combinations of institutions and algorithms can lead to very different outcomes. This is very useful in practice. It can help guide policymakers and scholars in countries in the Global South that are rapidly digitizing but have weak institutions, which is common. Ultimately they have to ensure that artificial intelligence is deployed in a transparent, accountable and ethical way so that we don’t trade democracy for speed. It is part of artificial intelligence and we have to think about how this plays into policy and democracy.
Artificial intelligence is transforming how public decisions are made, and the question of who oversees these decisions, and how, is becoming increasingly important. This study maps the bibliometric structure and thematic development of research on artificial intelligence, accountability, and good governance in public...
Merve Deniz Pak Güre· Sayıştay dergisi· 0 citations
It is argued that public uses of AI should not be evaluated primarily through technical efficiency, ethical compliance, or procedural safeguards, but through democratic legitimacy, and that societies retain the democratic authority to shape, question, supervise, correct, and, when necessary, reject their use.
A. Duche-Pérez, Marco Tulio Falconí Picardo, Emmanuel Neptalí Augusto Chávez Urquizo et al.· Frontiers in Political Scien...· 0 citations
Since the start of the
COVID
‐19 pandemic, many countries have been using artificial intelligence (
AI
) to replace civil service personnel. We argue that this practice undermines core democratic values. Using the public values framework, we identify four clusters of values that are threatened when bureaucratic...
L. Anastasopoulos· PAR. Public Administration R...· 0 citations
The analysis reviews existing research and real-world cases to show how artificial intelligence is being applied in public services, where it has improved productivity, and how it has changed the way citizens interact with government.
Petruț-Cătălin Lungu, M. Georgescu· New Trends in Sustainable Bu...· 0 citations
The article demonstrates how labour markets and migration governance function as "stress-test" domains in which continuous classification, automated risk assessment, worker scoring, and fragmented data environments can amplify existing structural inequalities.
A. Sinchev, Svetlana Bekmambetova· Work· 0 citations
It is suggested that progress in research on democracy and AI depends not only on further empirical investigation or technical refinement, but also on sustained conceptual work that makes democratic assumptions explicit and thus open to scrutiny.
Joachim S. Wiewiura, A. Jørgensen, Thomas Ploug· Philosophy & Technology· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.