Skip to content
Open access

Credit Card Fraud Detection Automation System Using Logistic Regression and XG Boost

Sep 2026 · International Journal of Applied Smart Interdisciplinary Technologies · 0 citations

TL;DR

An automated machine learning framework for credit card fraud detection that addresses the severe class imbalance inherent in fraud datasets through Random Under-Sampling and Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique (SMOTE).

Abstract

Credit card fraud poses a significant challenge to financial institutions, merchants, and customers, resulting in substantial financial losses and reduced consumer confidence. The rapid growth of digital payment systems has increased the volume and complexity of transactions, making automated and reliable fraud detection essential. This study proposes an automated machine learning framework for credit card fraud detection that addresses the severe class imbalance inherent in fraud datasets through Random Under-Sampling and Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique (SMOTE). The framework evaluates multiple approaches, including Logistic Regression, Random Forest, XGBoost, and an Autoencoder-based anomaly detection model, to provide a comprehensive comparison of supervised and unsupervised learning techniques. Unlike conventional approaches that primarily rely on accuracy, the proposed framework evaluates model performance using Precision, Recall, F1-score, ROC-AUC, and Precision-Recall AUC (PR-AUC), providing a more meaningful assessment of fraud detection capability. An initial Logistic Regression experiment using data preprocessing, exploratory analysis, statistical validation, and under-sampling achieved an accuracy of 93.91%. The extended framework aims to identify models that effectively balance the detection of fraudulent transactions with the reduction of false alarms. The proposed approach provides a scalable foundation for real-time transaction monitoring and can support adaptive fraud detection systems capable of responding to evolving fraud patterns.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access Aug 2026

An Enhancing Credit Card Fraud Detection through Data Preprocessing and SMOTE-Based Class Balancing: A Comparative Evaluation of Machine Learning Models

This study compares the performance of several supervised machine learning models for fraud detection, using a unified data preprocessing pipeline, and found that ensemble learning methods generally outperform single classifiers in both accuracy and minority-class recognition.

Nafiu Yahuza, Ahmad Baita Garko, Abubakar Atiku Muslim et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

CREDIT CARD FRAUD DETECTION USING ENSEMBLE MACHINE LEARNING METHODS

The study results show that ensemble techniques enhance the detection of fraudulent credit card transactions significantly and the proposed framework included data preprocessing and imbalanced data handling using SMOTE produced good results in terms of classification performance and reliable detections.

Moohanad Jawthari, Ihsan Sahib, N. H. Fadhil · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

FRAUD DETECTION IN FINTECH AND DIGITAL PAYMENTS USING A HYBRID MODEL COMBINING MACHINE LEARNING AND RISK MONITORING

The rapid development of Fintech and digital payments has increased the need for effective fraud detection and risk monitoring. This study evaluates fraud detection performance using imbalanced credit card transaction data. It compares Logistic Regression, Random Forest, and XGBoost, with XGBoost combined with SMOTE as...

Do Thi Thuy Nga, Ha Thi Nguyen, Hoa Thi Thanh Pham et al. · 0 citations
Open access 2026

Intelligent Real-Time Fraud Detection in Financial Institutions

The results show that the stacked ensemble produced a usable prototype-level fraud decision layer by combining supervised and anomaly based evidence, although threshold calibration, explainability, and validation on local institutional data remain necessary before operational deployment.

Nwadike U. S., Emmah V. T., M. D. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Credit Card Fraud Detection under Extreme Class Imbalance: A Comparison of KNN and Logistic Regression

The main finding is that under severe imbalance ROC-AUC can be misleading and PR-AUC is more informative; KNN baseline is a balanced detector without tuning, threshold-tuned LR baseline gives the best single operating point, and LR+SMOTE suits cases where recall is the priority.

Felicia Sword, Christopher Andreas · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Credit Card Fraud Detection Using Machine Learning and Risk-Based Alert Strategies

In data environments with severe class imbalances, a machine learning model can be designed as an effective triage tool and its actual value is not only to predict fraud, but also to establish a low-risk release, medium-risk verification, and high-risk manual review of the decision-making process for institutions and t...

Zi-Yue Meng · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.