These findings support guideline-based evaluation and clinician verification when generative AI chatbots are used to provide endodontic information relevant to decision support or dental education.
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Large language model (LLM) chatbots are increasingly used for dental information and decision support, yet their accuracy and short-term reproducibility in endodontics remain insufficiently established. This study compared five chatbots using open-ended questions derived from established AAE and ESE endodontic guidelines. Methods: Twenty-six guideline-based questions were content-validated by five endodontists using Lawshe’s Content Validity Ratio. ChatGPT-4o, Gemini 2.5 Pro, DeepSeek-V3-0324, ScholarGPT (academic version built on OpenAI’s GPT-4 architecture), and MedGebra GPT-4 answered each question across three days and three sessions per day, yielding 1170 responses. Two blinded endodontists scored responses on a 5-point guideline-concordance scale. Brunner–Langer LD-F2 analyses assessed model and temporal effects, while weighted kappa evaluated response consistency. Results: The overall model effect was significant (p < 0.001). ChatGPT-4o, Gemini 2.5 Pro, DeepSeek-V3-0324, and ScholarGPT showed comparable performance, whereas MedGebra GPT-4 performed significantly lower after Bonferroni correction. The day effect was not significant (p = 0.054), while the session effect (p = 0.048) and model × session interaction (p = 0.030) were significant. Weighted kappa values varied across models and assessment days, ranging from 0.689–0.730 for Gemini 2.5 Pro, 0.606–0.662 for ChatGPT-4o, 0.520–0.645 for DeepSeek-V3-0324, 0.458–0.592 for ScholarGPT, and 0.240–0.739 for MedGebra GPT-4. Conclusions: Guideline-aligned performance and short-term reproducibility differed across the evaluated chatbots, showing that accuracy and consistency represent distinct aspects of performance. Repeated assessment captured variation missed by single-session testing. These findings support guideline-based evaluation and clinician verification when generative AI chatbots are used to provide endodontic information relevant to decision support or dental education.
The findings describe informational quality, not clinical safety or decision-making, and support specialist verification before clinical use, and support specialist verification before clinical use.
Objectives: This study aimed to compare the performance of DeepSeek-V3, ChatGPT 4.0, ChatGPT 4.5, Gemini Advanced 2.0, and Grok in answering single-correct answer multiple-choice (SCQ), multiple-correct answer multiple-choice (MCQ), binary (true/false) (BQ), and open-ended questions (OEQ) based on the European Society...
Aims: This study compared the performance of the ChatGPT, Gemini, Copilot, and DeepSeek large language model–based chatbots in answering prosthodontic questions from the Turkish Dental Specialty Examination (DUS).
Methods: A total of 126 prosthodontic questions from DUS examinations conducted between 2012 and 2021 were...
Bülent Kadir Tartuk· Journal of Dental Sciences a...· 0 citations
AI chatbots can generate information with potential clinical relevance in anterior implant dentistry; however, variability in informational reliability persists and expert supervision remains essential before integrating such tools into clinical education.
Dalndushe Abdulai, Raghıb Suradı, Mehran Moghbel· Journal of Health Sciences a...· 0 citations
Accuracy and readability of chatbot responses to common patient questions on dry eye disease demonstrated complementary strengths, whereas ChatGPT 4.0 was most readable and accessible.
B. Kesimal, S. Kocamış· Akdeniz Medical Journal· 0 citations
BACKGROUND
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used by clinicians and learners for endodontic information, yet their reliability for irrigation-related knowledge remains unclear. This study evaluated the accuracy, readability, hallucination profile, clinical risk, and temporal stability of 4 general-purpose L...
Learn how Google DeepMind and GovTech Singapore uses lightweight on-device Gemma models to intercept conversational scams in private chats with zero cloud data egress.
Microsoft Research Blog· microsoft.comOct 12, 2026
StudentSim is a research system for evaluating and improving AI tutoring tools before they are tested with learners. It models how individuals may engage with tutors, giving feedback to improve tutor performance across subjects like chess, writing, and mathematics. The post Simulating student learning for better AI tutoring appeared first on Microsoft Research.
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 8, 2026