Skip to content

Accuracy and Short-Term Consistency of Generative AI Chatbots in Guideline-Based Endodontic Decision Support: A Multi-Model Benchmarking Study

Sep 2026 · Dental journal · Vol 14, pp. 598 · 0 citations · 41 references
Medicine

TL;DR

These findings support guideline-based evaluation and clinician verification when generative AI chatbots are used to provide endodontic information relevant to decision support or dental education.

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Large language model (LLM) chatbots are increasingly used for dental information and decision support, yet their accuracy and short-term reproducibility in endodontics remain insufficiently established. This study compared five chatbots using open-ended questions derived from established AAE and ESE endodontic guidelines. Methods: Twenty-six guideline-based questions were content-validated by five endodontists using Lawshe’s Content Validity Ratio. ChatGPT-4o, Gemini 2.5 Pro, DeepSeek-V3-0324, ScholarGPT (academic version built on OpenAI’s GPT-4 architecture), and MedGebra GPT-4 answered each question across three days and three sessions per day, yielding 1170 responses. Two blinded endodontists scored responses on a 5-point guideline-concordance scale. Brunner–Langer LD-F2 analyses assessed model and temporal effects, while weighted kappa evaluated response consistency. Results: The overall model effect was significant (p < 0.001). ChatGPT-4o, Gemini 2.5 Pro, DeepSeek-V3-0324, and ScholarGPT showed comparable performance, whereas MedGebra GPT-4 performed significantly lower after Bonferroni correction. The day effect was not significant (p = 0.054), while the session effect (p = 0.048) and model × session interaction (p = 0.030) were significant. Weighted kappa values varied across models and assessment days, ranging from 0.689–0.730 for Gemini 2.5 Pro, 0.606–0.662 for ChatGPT-4o, 0.520–0.645 for DeepSeek-V3-0324, 0.458–0.592 for ScholarGPT, and 0.240–0.739 for MedGebra GPT-4. Conclusions: Guideline-aligned performance and short-term reproducibility differed across the evaluated chatbots, showing that accuracy and consistency represent distinct aspects of performance. Repeated assessment captured variation missed by single-session testing. These findings support guideline-based evaluation and clinician verification when generative AI chatbots are used to provide endodontic information relevant to decision support or dental education.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Sep 2026

Guideline-Based Evaluation of Five Generative Artificial Intelligence Chatbot Platforms for Clinician-Oriented Questions on Open Temporomandibular Joint Surgery.

The findings describe informational quality, not clinical safety or decision-making, and support specialist verification before clinical use, and support specialist verification before clinical use.

Selin Gaş, Erdinç Sulukan, Büşra Korkmaz · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Evaluation of large language model responses to different types of questions based on European Society of Endodontology position statements

Objectives: This study aimed to compare the performance of DeepSeek-V3, ChatGPT 4.0, ChatGPT 4.5, Gemini Advanced 2.0, and Grok in answering single-correct answer multiple-choice (SCQ), multiple-correct answer multiple-choice (MCQ), binary (true/false) (BQ), and open-ended questions (OEQ) based on the European Society...

Merve Defişet, Merve Yeniçeri Özata, Ayşenur Çam · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Comparative evaluation of AI-based chatbots in answering prosthodontic questions from the Turkish Dental Specialty Exam (DUS)

Aims: This study compared the performance of the ChatGPT, Gemini, Copilot, and DeepSeek large language model–based chatbots in answering prosthodontic questions from the Turkish Dental Specialty Examination (DUS). Methods: A total of 126 prosthodontic questions from DUS examinations conducted between 2012 and 2021 were...

Bülent Kadir Tartuk · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Evaluation of large language model responses to expert questions in anterior implant dentistry: quality, accuracy, and readability

AI chatbots can generate information with potential clinical relevance in anterior implant dentistry; however, variability in informational reliability persists and expert supervision remains essential before integrating such tools into clinical education.

Dalndushe Abdulai, Raghıb Suradı, Mehran Moghbel · 0 citations
Aug 2026

Evaluating Large Language Models in Endodontic Irrigants: A Structured Assessment of Accuracy, Readability, Hallucination Subtypes and Clinical Risk.

BACKGROUND Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used by clinicians and learners for endodontic information, yet their reliability for irrigation-related knowledge remains unclear. This study evaluated the accuracy, readability, hallucination profile, clinical risk, and temporal stability of 4 general-purpose L...

Damla Erkal, Yunus Emre Çakmak, Kürşat Er · 0 citations

Related blog posts

Microsoft Research Blog Oct 12, 2026

Simulating student learning for better AI tutoring

StudentSim is a research system for evaluating and improving AI tutoring tools before they are tested with learners. It models how individuals may engage with tutors, giving feedback to improve tutor performance across subjects like chess, writing, and mathematics. The post Simulating student learning for better AI tutoring appeared first on Microsoft Research.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.