Skip to content
Review Open access

Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Techniques, Applications, Challenges and Future Directions - A Review

Aug 2026 · International Journal of Technology and Emerging Research · 0 citations · 19 references

TL;DR

It is concluded that explainability is a necessary, though not sufficient, condition for trustworthy Al, and concrete directions for future research are outlined, including standardised benchmarks, human-centred evaluation, and explainability for large generative models.

Abstract

Machine learning models, and deep neural networks in particular, now inform decisions in healthcare, finance, criminal justice, and other high-stakes domains, yet their internal reasoning remains largely opaque to the people who rely on their outputs. Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) is the body of methods and design principles that render such black-box systems interpretable to developers, regulators, and end users without materially degrading predictive performance. This review surveys the XAI landscape along four dimensions: the major families of explanation techniques-intrinsically interpretable models, post-hoc local methods such as LIME and SHAP, gradient- and attention-based visual explanations such as Grad-CAM, and counterfactual explanations; their realworld applications in domains including healthcare diagnostics, credit and financial risk scoring, and autonomous and safety-critical systems; the challenges that continue to limit adoption, including explanation fidelity, the absence of standardised evaluation metrics, computational cost, and scalability to large generative models; and the future directions the field must pursue. Drawing on a structured review of the recent literature, we compare techniques along scope, fidelity, and cost, and examine the regulatory pressures, including the EU AI Act and the GDPR "right to explanation," that are accelerating adoption. The synthesis shows that no single XAI technique is universally superior; effective explainability requires matching the method to the model class, the application domain, and the stakes of the decision. We conclude that explainability is a necessary, though not sufficient, condition for trustworthy Al, and outline concrete directions for future research, including standardised benchmarks, human-centred evaluation, and explainability for large generative models. Keywords: Explainable Al; interpretability; XAI applications; model transparency; trustworthy Al

Read PDF

Similar papers

Review Open access 2026

Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) for Transparent Decision Systems

Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) has become a key research focus nowadays due to the growing use of more intricate machine learning and deep learning systems in high-stakes systems. Although contemporary artificial intelligence (AI) methods show impressive prediction accuracy, the lack of transparency, a characteristic of their opaque (black-box) essence, presents serious forestalling issues in the areas of transparency, trust, accountability, and regulatory compliance. This interpretability is a disadvantage as numerous areas, like healthcare, finance, autonomous systems, and governance of the people, need AI systems to be applied in areas that are sensitive and require decision-making in a way that is comprehensible and explainable to human participants. XAI aims to solve these dilemmas by creating approaches and systems that allow human operators to comprehend, trust, and be able to handle AI-motivated decisions. XAI is not only aimed at providing explanations, but also at making these explanations meaningful, faithful to underlying model and applicable by various groups of users such as domain experts, developers, and policymakers. Enabling transparency, XAI leads to ethical AI, reduces bias and enhances debugging and model checking, and enables compliance with the developing regulatory frameworks like the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). This paper constitutes a thorough discussion of the XAI, as applied on transparent decision systems. It starts with a general introduction to motivation and the conceptualization of explainability in AI and goes on to provide a comprehensive literature review of model-specific and model-agnostic explainability algorithms. The suggested methodology combines both local and global explanatory approaches and transparency leadership framework. Experimental findings show the effectiveness of XAI techniques to enhance interpretability without causing a major loss in predictive accuracy. Lastly, the paper provides the practical implications, limitations, and research directions on the future of explainable and trustworthy AI systems.

Unknown authors · 0 citations
Review 2026

An Overview of Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) and Its Application

XAI provides a powerful framework for responsible AI development, challenges such as the performance-interpretability trade-off, lack of standardized evaluation metrics, and potential for human misinterpretation remain areas of active research.

P. Pradhan, Amol Rajmane, C. patil · 0 citations
Review Open access Jul 2026

Explainable Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare: Progress, Challenges, and Future Directions

This study aims to illustrate the significance of Abstract Science Intelligence (XAI) in the medical field, outlining its role in enhancing the interpretability of traditional "black-box" AI models.The goal of this research is to shed light on the significance of Abstract Science Intelligence (XAI) in the medical sector, elucidating its function in bolstering the interpretability of conventional "black-box" Artificial Intelligence models. In medical imaging, disease diagnosis, clinical decision support, and precision medicine, deep learning techniques have proven to be extremely successful; however, the inability to explain and understand how deep learning models work raises a variety of challenges for clinician trust, patient safety, ethical accountability, and regulatory compliance. This review provides a comprehensive overview of recent developments in XAI for healthcare, focusing on key methods for achieving interpretability, such as intrinsically interpretable models, and post-hoc explanation methods such as SHAP, LIME, Grad-CAM, attention mechanisms, surrogate models, and counterfactual explanations. A detailed review of the use of these methods in a variety of clinical areas such as radiology, oncology, cardiology, genomics, electronic health records and drug discovery is also given. Furthermore, the paper examines technical issues concerning explanation fidelity, computational complexity, robustness, scalability, and model validation, as well as ethical issues such as fairness, transparency, privacy, bias, and governance. Other research trends are also discussed, such as causal explainability, humancentered XAI, models that are uncertain, human-in-the-loop systems, and evaluation frameworks. In summary, the review highlights that explainability is not just a technical aspect but a key component in creating AI systems that are both trustworthy and clinically sound and can assist in safe and effective health care decision-making.

Dr. S. Rasheed, Mansoor Ali, Dr .A. Meher Nisha et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access 2024

The Emergence of Explainable AI in Modern Decision Systems

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has revolutionized decision-making systems of today, allowing automated data analysis, intelligent prediction, and real-time decision-making in a variety of application areas, including healthcare, finance, transportation, manufacturing, cybersecurity, and public administration. While deep learning and other advanced machine learning techniques have been able to deliver impressive results, numerous AI models can be considered as ‘black-box’ models, meaning that they give very accurate predictions without actually offering understandable explanations for their decisions. This lack of transparency has generated a number of concerns about trust, accountability, fairness, ethical compliance, and regulatory acceptance. Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) is thus becoming an indispensable research field which aims to reconcile the predictive power and human interpretability. By explaining the reasoning behind AI system output, model importance, feature impact, and confidence scores, XAI helps users gain insights into how the system is working. This is done to build trust among stakeholders and promote responsible AI governance and decision-making. This paper offers a detailed overview of the concept of Explainable AI in contemporary decision-making processes, covering its theoretical underpinnings, its development, prominent explainability methods, implementation in practice, hurdles, and prospects. A methodology is advanced to embed explainability in the AI decision-making process, starting from data preprocessing to generating explanations and human evaluation. The paper also delves into the implications of explainability on decision quality, user trust, model reliability, and regulatory compliance. The results highlight the potential of explainability to enhance human comprehension and foster responsible use of AI systems in high-stakes decision-making scenarios.

Mahabala H.N · 0 citations
Review Open access 2023

The Emergence of Explainable Artificial Intelligence in Modern Decision Systems

Through the application of Artificial intelligence (AI), there has been the establishment of the technology as a cornerstone in current decision systems in essential fields like health, finance, transport, industrial automation, and the governance of citizens. Although traditional AI and machine learning frameworks, specifically deep learning models, have shown outstanding predictive performance, their nature is not enlightened by default, and as such, they have cast considerable doubt on the issues of trust, accountability, fairness, and regulatory compliance. It is thanks to this limitation that Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) as a paradigm has emerged, aimed at ensuring that AI-driven decisions are easy to understand and interpret by the human stakeholders without major performance reduction. This paper is a thorough and stepwise analysis of how XAI was created in current decision systems. It starts with the historical contextualization of the development of AI, as an expert system driven by rules, to a data-driven black-box model and the increasing demand to explain decision-making processes. The paper provides a critical literature review of the current research on XAI methods classifying them into model-intrinsic and post-hoc methods of explanation, and discussing their relevance to various fields. An elaborate methodology is suggested, that incorporates explainability protocols into the AI choice channel, such as information pre-processing, model order, explanation creation and human-centered assessment. Additionally, the paper evaluates the experimental findings and case-based debates on how XAI enhances transparency, end-user trust, compliance with regulations, and system resilience. Popular explainability methods are also compared and evaluated including SHAP, LIME, saliency maps, and rule extraction. The results indicate that explainable models, in addition to increasing interpretability, can also help to improve debugging, bias detection and ethical AI deployment. The paper ends by recommending the current challenges, areas of open research, and future roles of XAI in the development of responsible and human-centered intelligent decision systems.

Meena Krishnan · 0 citations