Skip to content

Intrinsic Motivation in Reinforcement Learning: A Research Agenda for Adaptive Self-Organisation

Sep 2026 · 0 citations · 28 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

This perspective and tutorial article discusses whether intrinsic rewards in artificial neural systems can support adaptation, functional specialisation and higher-level self-organisation without a shared external objective, and outlines three experimental directions.

Abstract

Biological cells can be viewed as individual, interacting agents whose collective dynamics give rise to adaptive behaviour at multiple levels of organisation, from individual cells through tissues to whole multicellular organisms. In this perspective and tutorial article we discuss whether intrinsic rewards in artificial neural systems can support adaptation, functional specialisation and higher-level self-organisation without a shared external objective. We review empowerment, curiosity, learning progress, information gain, unsupervised skill discovery, mutual information estimation and the use of world models for intrinsic reward computation. Particular attention is given to failure modes showing when such objectives do not produce sustained exploration or increasingly complex behaviour. We argue that more capable systems may require complementary objectives, communication, memory, learning at multiple temporal scales and environmental constraints. Based on this perspective, we outline three experimental directions. These include a resource-constrained environment in which otherwise stable behavioural attractors become unsustainable, allowing us to test whether environmental constraints can mitigate characteristic failure modes of intrinsic objectives. The network of recurrent agents with per-agent intrinsic rewards, and a hierarchical world-model agent in which exploratory motor competence develops before goal-directed behaviour. These experiments are intended to test whether intrinsic learning can lead to adaptive organisation at progressively higher levels.

View source

Similar papers

Preprint Aug 2026

Evolution of cooperation with Q-learning: how much information do we need?

Mechanistic analyses show that a moderate neighborhood size enables individuals to strike an optimal balance between information sufficiency and decision-making tractability, which allows them to detect reciprocal opportunities while avoiding the deterioration of decision quality due to information overload.

Yi-Hsin Ku, Xin Ou, Ji-Qiang Zhang et al. · 0 citations
Conference Open access Sep 2026

Adaptive Reward Design in Reinforcement Learning: A Taxonomy and Survey

A unified view of ARD in RL is provided by introducing a taxonomy, organized by the primary driver of the reward variation, that distinguishes external-feedback-driven reward updates from reward adaptations driven by endogenous within-run signals and those conditioned on exogenous context signals.

Raphaela Baybas, Carlo D'Eramo, Philipp Brune · 0 citations
Conference Aug 2026

Reinforcement Learning: Paradigm, Foundations, and Applications

Reinforcement learning (RL) occupies a distinct position within machine learning, differing fundamentally from both supervised and unsupervised paradigms. Unlike supervised learning, RL agents receive evaluative feedback – judgment on the consequences of actions – rather than explicit correct answers, and they learn co...

Khaja Akram Mohammed · 0 citations
Preprint Sep 2026

Learning to cooperate in a changing world: How caring about the future promotes cooperation across scales

In social dilemmas, individuals need to forgo short-term temptations to achieve synergistic collective outcomes through cooperation. Previous work has examined mechanisms through which cooperation can evolve, including direct reciprocity, indirect reciprocity, environmental stochasticity, network reciprocity, and demog...

Yu-Xin Geng, Xing-Ru Chen, Xin Wang et al. · 0 citations

Related blog posts

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.