Skip to content
#machine learning Conference Open access

LSR-Net: Learning the Forward Evolution Operator for Nonlinear Fluid Dynamics

Jun 2026 · Asian Control Conference · pp. 296-301 · 0 citations · 17 references
Physics Computer Science

TL;DR

Results demonstrate that LSR-Net significantly outperforms the baseline short-range network (SR-Net) as well as FNO and DeepONets in predictive accuracy, achieving substantially lower relative errors by effectively capturing both local fine-scale structures and crucial global pattern interactions.

Abstract

We introduce the Long-Short-Range Neural Network (LSR-Net), a novel neural operator architecture designed for data-driven forward evolution modeling, and extends it to the prediction of nonlinear fluid dynamics. LSR-Net learns the evolution operator of a dynamical system solely from pairs of initial and future state snapshots, which splits the learnable integral kernel into long-range (LR) and short-range (SR) components within stacked network blocks. While the SR component uses standard convolutions to capture local dynamics, the LR component employs a sum-of-exponentials (SOE) representation. This allows for the efficient computation of global interactions as a trainable Fourier multiplier, reducing computational complexity to $\mathcal{O}(n \log n)$ where $n$ is the number of pixels in an input snapshot and requiring only a few parameters per channel. LSR-Net is evaluated on three challenging 2D benchmarks: the coupled Burgers equation, the wave equation with a spatially varying coefficient, and the nonlinear shallow water equation (SWE). Results demonstrate that LSR-Net significantly outperforms the baseline short-range network (SR-Net) as well as FNO and DeepONets in predictive accuracy, achieving substantially lower relative errors by effectively capturing both local fine-scale structures and crucial global pattern interactions.

Read PDF

Similar papers

#artificial intelligence Conference Open access Jun 2018

Gibson Env: Real-World Perception for Embodied Agents

This paper investigates developing real-world perception for active agents, proposes Gibson Environment for this purpose, and showcases a set of perceptual tasks learned therein.

F. Xia, Amir Zamir, Zhi-Yang He et al. · 1,069 citations · ⚡112
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54

Diffusion models as plug-and-play priors

The possibility of inferring high-dimensional data inference in a model that consists of a prior and an auxiliary differentiable constraint given some additional information is considered, thereby allowing a range of potential applications in adapting models to new domains and tasks.

Alexandros Graikos, Esmeralda S. Whitammer, N. Jojic et al. · 316 citations · ⚡15

Trajectory Balance: Improved Credit Assignment in GFlowNets

It is proved that any global minimizer of the trajectory balance objective can define a policy that samples exactly from the target distribution, and empirically demonstrate the benefits of the trajectories balance objective for GFlowNet convergence, diversity of generated samples, and robustness to long action sequenc...

Esmeralda S. Whitammer, Moksh Jain, Emmanuel Bengio et al. · 302 citations · ⚡60

KTO: Model Alignment as Prospect Theoretic Optimization

This work proposes a HALO that directly maximizes the utility of generations instead of maximizing the log-likelihood of preferences, and suggests that the best loss depends on the inductive biases most appropriate for a given setting, an oft-overlooked consideration.

Kawin Ethayarajh, Winnie Xu, Niklas Muennighoff et al. · 195 citations · ⚡28

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 23, 2026

Q&A: How AI came to model the “messy” human mind

Assistant Professor Benjamin Lindquist studies how engineers deliberately injected randomness into early AI, giving rise to deep-learning models that sometimes hallucinate.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.