Sep 2026· Journal of Visualized Experiments· Vol 235· 0 citations
Medicine
TL;DR
The protocol emphasizes several key components, including the preparation of standardized healthcare datasets, the development of stable machine learning models, the evaluation of predictive performance, the generation of clinically relevant explanations, and the statistical assessment of reproducibility across repeated experiments.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly being adopted as a valuable tool for clinical decision-making, disease prediction, medical diagnosis, and personalized healthcare. However, a lack of transparency, inconsistent implementation of explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) methods, and limited reproducibility remain major barriers to the trustworthy deployment of AI models in clinical settings. This paper proposes a systematic, reproducible, and transparent protocol for developing, evaluating, and interpreting explainable AI models for healthcare applications. The workflow begins with computational environment setup, followed by data acquisition and characterization, preprocessing, feature engineering, model development, hyperparameter optimization, predictive performance evaluation, explainability analysis, statistical validation, and reproducibility assessment. The protocol incorporates XAI methods such as SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP), Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations (LIME), Gradient-weighted Class Activation Mapping (Grad-CAM), Integrated Gradients, attention visualization, and counterfactual explanations to generate both global and local model interpretations. The protocol emphasizes several key components, including the preparation of standardized healthcare datasets, the development of stable machine learning models, the evaluation of predictive performance, the generation of clinically relevant explanations, and the statistical assessment of reproducibility across repeated experiments. By integrating model development, explainability, quantitative and qualitative evaluation, statistical validation, and reproducibility assessment into a unified workflow, this protocol provides a comprehensive framework for developing transparent and reproducible AI models for healthcare applications.
It is concluded that explainable artificial intelligence improves trust, reliability, and accountability in healthcare systems and is a prerequisite for successful integration of intelligent technologies into clinical practice.
Riya Jacob K· International Journal of Tec...· 0 citations
An accessible overview of XAI is provided, including saliency maps, perturbation-based and feature-attribution approaches, concept- based methods, and example-based reasoning, as well as uncertainty quantification as a complementary approach for assessing prediction reliability, along with common misconceptions and eme...
Gorkem Durak, H. Aktas, Tugba Akinci D'Antonoli et al.· Diagnostic and Interventiona...· 0 citations
A framework through XAI to incorporate various health data sources such as electronic health records, medical imaging, laboratory reports, and wearable sensor information, which can be integrated in the context of achieving higher predictive performance in disease prediction and treatment stratification, as well as dec...
M. Aparna, S. Lahane, Dr. Bharti A. Dixit· Journal of Intelligent Decis...· 0 citations
This systematic review provides a comprehensive analysis of XAI methods specifically applied to tabular healthcare data for classification tasks, revealing that SHAP remains the dominant post-hoc method, achieving strong model fidelity but showing inconsistent alignment with clinical expert reasoning.
Angelower Santana-Velásquez, M. B. Salazar-Sánchez· Computers· 0 citations
Current evidence suggests that XAI in PD research provides methodological tools that may support transparency and model understanding, but evidence for clinical trust, usability, and real‐world deployment remains limited.
Lorenzo Rettori, E. Rovini, Hamido Fujita et al.· WIREs Data Mining and Knowle...· 0 citations
A narrative review of explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) in healthcare, specifically medical diagnosis, based on a targeted selection guided by a narrative review of recent literature, from 2019 to 2026, conducted on Scopus, Web of Science, and PubMed databases.
Guilherme Barbosa, Eduardo Carvalho, D. Oliveira et al.· Diagnostics· 0 citations
Related blog posts
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 15, 2026
AI is moving beyond impressive demos. After World Summit AI 2026 in Amsterdam, GPT-Lab's Muhammad Waseem reflects on what organizations need to make AI agents reliable, responsible and genuinely useful in everyday work. The post Building trustworthy AI: The role of AI harnesses, intent contracts and evals appeared first on GPT-Lab.
Learn how Google DeepMind and GovTech Singapore uses lightweight on-device Gemma models to intercept conversational scams in private chats with zero cloud data egress.
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.